Re: Overunity --- Not!

Jerry W. Decker ( (no email) )
Sun, 16 Aug 1998 12:05:42 -0500

Hi Folks!

The following was posted to the KeelyNet list but did not get through
since only subscribers may post, I suspect he will subscribe shortly and
he wanted this passed to the list for discussion and thought;
=============
> From: Jerry W. Decker <jdecker@keelynet.com>
> To: KeelyNet@DallasTexas.net
> Cc: freenrg-l@eskimo.com
> Subject: Re: Overunity --- Not!
> Date: Saturday, August 15, 1998 2:01 PM
>
> Hi Folks!
>
> With regard to Charles Wilde's excellent experimental report,
> here is a comment from an electrical engineer that you might
> find of interest;
>
> Gee. Lab error. Whoodathunkit?
>
> A larger resonant circuit can easily have several kilowatts of energy
> running around inside it. The deflection on your color tv is a good
> example.
> Just like a piggy bank, the energy got there a nickel at a time. Also
> like the bank, you can empty that particular set of nickels only once.
>
> This appeared to be a profound and fundamental Tesla error. It was not
> obvious to me that he always was able to draw the distinction between
> resonant energy buildup and actual energy sourcing.
> --

Here is the response to the above comments;

While it is true that the arc gap on a tesla primary represents
a short to the power supply; and the further observation that this
tank circuit goes in and out of resonance, during which time power
is inputed.

A different situation can be made with high induction coils, and
perhaps even tesla coil design if someone has not already
incorporated it. (Not to my knowledge)

The first basic difference is that these coils of thousands of
winds can be made to ring at frequencies much higher than that
predicted by quarter wavelength design. This is because of high
internal capacitance establishing a high natural resonant frequency.

Now there are several ways to accomplish this, all using arc gaps.
Now this is supposed to be a forum in which ideas can be thrown out
so I am forwarding the following fact if not discovery which I call
binary resonance.

For every series resonant phase a mirror image can be made that
is simply the same circuit placed backwards with regards to its inputs.
These are then simply 2 series resonant branches in parallel, but also
180 degrees out of phase by their relative positions. Now the
midpoints of both resonant phases contain unobvious potentials
expressed as a higher resonant voltage within both the inductor
and capacitor, but existing in opposition to each other. With
two phases at 180 as described one midpoint contains an unobvious
compression of electrons concurrent with the other midpoint
containing an unobvious void of electrons.

Place a load across the midpoints and the unobvious becomes obvious.
Twice the voltage exists between the midpoints than either resonant
rise alone. What may not be immediately noticed is that if a short is
placed across the midpoints the whole circuit then becomes parallel
resonant. As a simple puzzle I will leave the fact that twice the
amperage exists along the bridge than on either side.

This is easily explained but more importantly this circuit now
represents configuration of a switch which when in open position is
series resonant and when closed is parallel resonant. This switch
can take the form of an arc gap in which the oscillation is not
going in and out of resonance,but rather expressing its oscillation
BETWEEN resonances.

Now this may change our nickel of energy a little bit because the
number of free electrons oscillating in the coil is many times
greater in the parallel resonant condition (10/1 in my model), than
is actually inputed by the source. Also the frequency established by
this violet arc gap shows that by the time these free electrons
are to reverse polarity they could have only traveled 1/10th the
length of the wire at the speed of light. (in my model)

Using this system of two 56 Henry coils in binary resonant condition I
was able to produce many different forms of energy release including
one demonstration of quarter inch miniature lightening disharge
over water at less than 10 watt draw from a conventional 110 ac
outlet.

No transformer was necessary. I am applying this work towards the
nvestigation of S. Meyer HV electrolysis claims and have began
work on a message board to post results. In the complete theory that
I am working on 4 phases, and not just 2 will be used.

Will post message board soon as it may not interest all the group.
Sincere in the work,
H. Norris
mnorris@akron.infi.net

--            Jerry Wayne Decker  /   jdecker@keelynet.com         http://keelynet.com   /  "From an Art to a Science"      Voice : (214) 324-8741   /   FAX :  (214) 324-3501   KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187