Re: Clem as a Rotary Heat Pump

LARRY SULLIVAN ( polymercanada@bc.sympatico.ca )
Tue, 06 Apr 1999 07:10:06 -0700

Hi Rem;
Do you have Jims design/Clem engine drawings available, I would be
interested in it if you could e-mail back.

Larry
Marinus Berghuis wrote:
>
> At 03:45 6/04/99 -0500, you wrote:
> >Hi Folks!
> >
> >I have been having dreams lately about the Clem engine and there seems
> >to be some synchronicities which are pointed to it. One of these dreams
> >showed the diagram of the engine with the input side in red and the
> >nozzle area in blue.
> >
> >Hi Jerry,
>
> You have been dreaming about the Clem design and I have quietly been
> gathering material to build it. I have two cars which I am wrecking and
> will use the bearings, flywheel, brake piping etc to construct the thing.
> *I can only make the cone 300 mm long and looked at the design as shown on
> Jims page. The drawing is faulty as the pump is shown on one side and the
> starter on the other side. It should be starter on the take off, pump with
> a direct connection from the take off to the pump. The starter is to bring
> it up to the critical speed after which the pump keeps creating the pressure
> My only concern is that the fluid pipe diameter must be large enough to
> provide sufficient space to suck in the oil while at the same time the
> velocity of the drum helps to maintain momentum. I guess that the cone must
> be of sufficient weight to act as a flywheel so in my case I will use a
> solid 6" bar steel and connect a flywheel at the end with the nozzles
> bolted to the flywheel after removing the gear teeth. It will need careful
> balancing to 20000 revs to stop any vibration and the bearings need to be
> oil fed and high speed.
> The pump pressure I am uncertain about but if you use a swash plate
> hydrolic pump, you have a non slip positive pressure. I have a gear pump 1"
> in and out
> and will have to experiment to see how much pressure it is able to generate.
> A little 12 volt one goes up to 70 p.s.i but I would think that 600 p.si.
> would be a minimum to get the speed required.
> Very interested to see you think this way as I am sure the answer to 100 %
> utilisation of mechanically generated heat is where the answer lies.
> I tried it with mercury but found it too dicey (poisonous) Oil would be a
> much better answer. Heat pumps are over unity. I had one in my office
> delivering 10 kw. of heat with a 1.5 h.p. motor and the 7 day adventists
> church in Palmerston North takes heat from 1 bore, takes the heat from the
> water and pumps it back into the ground,
> Total power usage 7.5 kw. and output in the region of 50 Kw in heat.
> The whole complex is heated in under 2 hours from starting.
>
> The only draw back for experimenters is the need to have a lathe and
> tooling to get it off the ground.
> I have now acquired most of it so that is also on my list of trials.
> Next week my final on Joe's cell. It either works or bust.
> After that the mercury spinning top and from there to Clem's design and if
> the reports are accurate, I should be able to generate my own power shortly.
> My computor expert friends tell me that y2k is going to create power
> hickups etc and we have just had a speech from our prime minister that our
> illustrious government has everything under control and citizens should no
> longer need to worry.
> When I hear politicians talk that way, I do begin to worry !!
>
> Greetings from down under
>
> REN
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> with the body text: leave Keelynet
> list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> -------------------------------------------------------------