Mark Bennett sent some information which had this embedded in it,
thought it was worth sharing, thanks Mark!
------
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 17:33:13 -0700
From: Peter Larsen <plarsen@isd.net>
To: "rife-list@eskimo.com" <rife-list@eskimo.com>
Subject: Archeology and Zappers???
To the List,
The following is true, and I am trying to gather more information on
this as well.
I have a good friend of many years who is head of the "Acquisitions
Department", for the Minneapolis Public Library System. He has related
a story to me that he has come across a few times in his career. Do you
know what a "fetish" is in archeological terms? It's a curio, item,
totem, that is unexplained and which shows up in various quantities in
certain cultures, which seems to be unique to that culture. These are
considered to have some mysterious properties religious, magical, etc.
They are hand made and held in reverence by that culture.
He has told me this a few times, and now I have an audience that might
give me more insight. In various South American and Mesopotamic cultures
archeologists and geologists have been finding by the thousands this
certain kind of fetish in grave sites. It is a small clay cylinder
(palm sized), with a carbon core that fits loosely into the cylinder.
Since they are a unknown item the archeological community has
classified them as such and that's that. They appear to have been worn
around the neck.
In the US southwest, Hopi territory, exists rock paintings of square
waves, sine waves, triangle waves, sine waves one on top of the other
showing a 180 degree relationship. I have the video footage in my
possession. I wonder how many times these devices have been
re-invented by mankind through his endless cycles of existence?
Comments welcome!
Peter Larsen
---Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 19:54:26 -0700From: Peter Larsen <plarsen@isd.net>To: "rife-list@eskimo.com" <rife-list@eskimo.com>Dear Wyley,
Aha!, you are perceptive. This is my theory based on other research Iam doing in an archeological sense. It might be a bit too much forthis list, but suffice it to say that the clay that was used to formthe vessels contained aluminum salts. The Egyptians called thissubstance in the clay "natron". To some folks out there this should beringing bells.
Natron comes into play in the Egyptian and other cultures as the true"salt of the earth" that is referred to in ancient texts. When relatedto geo-polymers it plays an even more significant roll. If you can findthe book, "The Pyramids; An Enigma Solved", by Dr. Joseph Davidovits1988 published by Dorset Press, you will start to understand howsignificant a roll natron played in ancient civilizations.
This book is out of print and very hard to find. I can see why! Inthis book Dr. Davidovits shows the extensive geopolymer knowledge ofthe ancients. Ifwe were to build a pyramid today, wouldn't we build it by pouring andcasting it block by block, using the faces of the opposing blocks toform part of the mold? All you need then is a small crew to mix aggregate, binder, and water.Why do we only see carving and quarry marks on blocks of the NewKingdom and not on those of the Old Kingdom? Why do only see carving and quarrying as the ONLY method ofconstruction? THIS SCARES ME THE MOST! We are far too conditioned inour thinking. Get out of that box! How would you position casing blocks within microinches of one another and not even chip the corners of these enormousmasses? Sorry, we are getting a little removed from the list withthis, but this I feel, is part of the "Song" of mankind. Who says ancients had to be dumb, illiterate, and unaware? Who saysmodern day man is smartest, best so far, the culmination of all thatprecededhim? The same people that got us into the mess we are in today, that'swho. If you ascribe the right capabilities to ancients you start to see.
Good question! Sorry for the babble all.
Peter Larsen
Wyley G. Kitzmiller wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----> > From: Peter Larsen [mailto:plarsen@isd.net]> > Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 1998 8:49 PM> > To: lizardhaven@zippnet.net;> > rife-list@eskimo.com> > Subject: Re: Archeology and Zappers???> >> > Hi Pat,> > In many cultures people are buried with> > objects which were of importance in> > this life and possibly the next. They> > were way ahead of us there, who said> > they were used up? Our society is> > probably one of the few who hasn't /> > doesn't recycle. This type of battery> > just needs some grape or lemon juice> > to activate it...> >> > Peter Larsen> >>> Why do you believe that these objects are a kind> of electrolytic cell? Do they contain something> else besides the carbon? What would they use for> an anode?>> Wyley
Hi Peter,
I thought your post was interesting. Do you have any more e-mailableinfo.
I've also remember seeing on several different occasions companiesannouncing a way to make concrete like rock with various plants; onewas in regard to Easter Island statues and the other to rebuildingkuwait with a process involving sand.
Please find attached collected bits from the alchemical white powederof gold e-mail list which you'll hopefully find interesting.
_________________________________________________________DO YOU YAHOO!?Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com