Re: stones and sounds
LARRY SULLIVAN ( polymercanada@bc.sympatico.ca )
Tue, 20 Apr 1999 19:31:34 -0700
This is exactly what I feel the effect is. My last posting may not of
been all that clear (not a good idea to get into quantum physics at 3:00
A.M).
The earth being a sperical cyclone, that is a high pressure area in the
outside parimeter with a low pressure in the inside. The features are
the same as with a tornado or cyclone its a interesting parculiar
feature, the inside rotation is pushing mass on to the parimeter of the
cyclone and if you are outside of the parimeter it is pulling into the
parimeter(the equallibrum point)
Velosity dictates the force,the higher the speed the higher the
force,the middle being the highest and hence graduated less until it is
least at the parimeter. I see the earths vortex much as two inverted
votexes converging into a centre apex. Each spining at different
directions hence the different polarity at the earths poles. I believe I
am correct in saying that if one is to fill up a sink and then open the
drain the direction of the vortex is opposite if you are in the north or
the south hemisphere. Also one is going to have one cyclone force being
larger than the other otherwise you couldn't have a cyclone in the first
place. So there goes the whole concept of the spider effect.
Interesting observation rocks move to the surface of the earth, they
start deep down but will always move ever so slowly to the surface. The
aether energy is also pushing down on the crust so you have the meeting
of two forces at the earths crust. Gravity being the result of a
equalibruim of these two forces.
The same principal also applies to the molecular level. The centre
protons and neutrons spining at a higher velosity creates a low pressure
area that attracts but also repelling at the same time. The electrons
circumventing the centre at the equalibreum point. The atoms having the
same inverted vortex spider effect as the earths. Only in this case the
direction is dictated via the larger earths vortex(gravity). It is a
chain reaction. The atoms point all the same direction. Atoms make up
matter and hence matter has a force field around it pointing the same
direction as the atoms ofcoarse, which is what we are calling the spider
effect on mass.
Hence all we need to do is effect the molecular direction of the
inverted vortex and we change the orientation of gravity. So bend the
vortex via a energy field such as HV,magnetisim or Sound and then direct
the speed of the spin via sustained frequency and I believe we have the
answer not only to gravity but to directing energy and perhaps also to
polydimentional shifts.(which is another topic).
We do not need to effect the whole mass but only to initiate a
controled chain reaction on the molecular level. So in reality not much
energy really is needed to effect a much larger mass. Two things that
always seem to be always predominant is first to use a force to disrupt
the orientation as in tipping a spinning top and then using a sustained
frequency to control the speed of the spin and direction of the top.
Example put a spinning top in a perfect sphere and if you could control
the speed and the direction of the spin it should move around the
sphere,contrary to gravity.
Larry
Larry
Jerry W. Decker wrote:
>
> Hi Ted et al!
>
> Just can't get over your grasp of the subject and I am DULY
> IMPRESSED...this is what I and many others have been working
> towards...to evoke such thoughtful responses...excellent.
>
> One other item I'd like you to consider is the claim of 'inertial drive'
> using the cycloid pattern.....
>
> Now, it basically is a conversion of angular velocity to a linear
> velocity....although it only works in very tiny steps, the amount of the
> weight and the rpms of the rotation will determine the number of
> repititions per second....jerky in the mechanical form but it does work.
>
> Dan Davidson and I have long discussed the alteration of the electorn
> orbit to that of a cycloid...in each atom, then in all atoms in a
> molecule, then in all molecules in an entire mass aggregate...Keely's
> idea of 'graduation' or harmonizing all mass components to one central
> pattern...the cycloid....thus, the mass would move silently and
> mysteriously in any direction the cycloid was pointed. pure magic to
> the uninitiated...
>
> I note Ivanov's animation clearly shows a projection of mass waves which
> are distorted when the spider tail is up and spread out on the bottom of
> the mass. When the tail is at the bottom of the mass, the deflection
> diverts the incoming aether/zpe influx....
>
> I can't help but get the feeling the cycloid is somehow involved in this
> despite the obvious links to a vortex type action which collects and
> focuses the aether/zpe influx or defocuses for weight loss/levitation.
>
> But I don't want to divert attention from this document in the least, it
> is simply amazing and the best thing I've seen in many, many years,
> tying together so many diverse observations....
>
> The test will be in figuring out HOW to make a mass lose its weight,
> WITHOUT having to resort to superconductivity or paramagnetic repulsion.
> --
> Jerry Wayne Decker / jdecker@keelynet.com
> http://keelynet.com / "From an Art to a Science"
> Voice : (214) 324-8741 / FAX : (214) 324-3501
> KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> with the body text: leave Keelynet
> list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> -------------------------------------------------------------