Re: John Bajak's Device

Steve ( steve@primeline.net )
Tue, 20 Apr 1999 23:10:45 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Previous message: Paul Callender: "(no subject)"
Next message: LARRY SULLIVAN: "Re: stones and sounds"
Maybe in reply to: Paul Baucom: "John Bajak's Device"

> Has anyone tried to duplicate either of these experiments?
> Also.. could anyone explain what exactly this means:
> "a scalar generated from interferometry." I've been studying
> caduceus coils for a couple years now, but haven't done any
> serious research on them yet. Can anyone offer any insight into
> cad coils vs. an interferometer for creating "scalars"?

Hmm. it's been brought to my attention that there was some
confusion regarding this post.. the above text is what I wrote,
the rest was copied from a Keelynet file. I probably should have
put that in quotes or something like that.

ttyl
-Steve

--      steve@primeline.net | ICQ: 5113616    Digital Fusion: http://www.darknet.net/fusion

Previous message: Paul Callender: "(no subject)"
Next message: LARRY SULLIVAN: "Re: stones and sounds"
Maybe in reply to: Paul Baucom: "John Bajak's Device"