I sent an email to this Mike fellow, author of that Boson Abstract sent
in by Marcelo from another list and here is his response, be sure to
check out his webpage, it is the MOST INTRIGUING NEW CONCEPT I have seen
in a very long time and I'm sending it out to a boatload of other
contacts, please DO READ THAT PAGE!!...here is his email;
==========================
"Jerry W. Decker" <jdecker@keelynet.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Mike!
>
> A friend posted a copy of the following abstract title on the KeelyNet
> discussion list with you as the author;
>
> HOW TO HOLD BOZONS AT BAY
>
> An interesting proposition which I added to and posted at the
following;
>
> http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/archive/00002413.htm
> http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/archive/00002415.htm
>
> An excerpt from your brief text says;
> > They will build their own vacuum...as they can also use the pump z
> > wave lost inward to set in sync yet out of phase with proceeding
> > waves in the creation of a higher frequency in focal passage.
> > Kilowatts of conversion to d.c. I have exact plans for this and
more.
>
> Shouldn't that be 'higher frequency in LOCAL passage'?
NO, PUMP Z WAVES WHICH ARE IN SYNC YET OUT OF PHASE, AND TRAVELLING TO A
CENTRAL SPHERICAL POINT COMBINE TO BE ONE AFTER FOCAL PASSING WITHIN A
COPPER BALL.
THIS WILL NOW ATTRACT SMALLER PARTICLES, TO GIVE OFF DIRECT CURRENT.
WAVES COMING FROM THE SAME POINT ARE SET OUT OF PHASE BY A SPHERICAL
COPPER LAYERING DELAY MECHANISM.
>
> Have you done any experiments to verify this or do you have any
> additional information posted that we could read?
YES, THOUGH IT IS SOMEWHAT POORLY WRITTEN/ ORGANIZED.
http://www.geocities.com/ResearchTriangle/Lab/6771/magnet.html
YOU WILL NOT FIND ANY EXPERIMENTS OF THIS KIND RECORDED IN HISTORY.
THE CLOSEST I'VE EVER FOUND IS SOME ANCIENT GARBAGE BY VICTOR
SCHAUBERGER, AVAILABLE FROM BORDERLANDS SCIENCES [WEIRD OUTFIT]
> If you visit the KeelyNet site below and read some of our files at;
>
> http://www.keelynet.com/files.htm
>
> you will get a handle on what we are trying to achieve.
>
> If you have a working proof that you might want to get out, we have a
> PoP (proof of principle) and shareware proposal posted at;
>
> http://www.keelynet.com/pop.htm (proof of principle) and
> http://www.keelynet.com/share.htm (shareware proposal)
>
> This way anyone could build a proof and verify it in hardware. Once
> done the author/inventor would reap the benefits of a great number of
> highly appreciative people for cracking the puzzle.
>
> If you have anything else you'd like to share on the matter, I am
> certainly interested...thanks for your time.
>
I WOULD LIKE TO TELL YOU MORE WHEN I GET TIME.
-- Jerry Wayne Decker / jdecker@keelynet.com http://keelynet.com / "From an Art to a Science" Voice : (214) 324-8741 / FAX : (214) 324-3501 KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187