>Hi Brad et al!
>
>You wrote;
>> Regarding the issue of time travel.
>> I am by no means an expert on this subject, but from reading one of
>> Stephen Hawking's (physicist) book, it appears that if wormholes
>> exist allowing shortened travel between two points in space and/or
>> time, it would require tremendous energies to open and keep open
>> these wormholes allowing something to pass through them. That is
>> what I have gathered so far. Supposing wormholes do exist, somewhere
>> in the ether. There is no commonly known technology that will allow
>> physical time travel. What about light ? Is it possible that light
>> can enter these wormholes and traverse space and time; light being
>> on roughly the same level as wormholes are ? If so, might it be
>> possible that an artificial wormhole just big enough for light to
>> pass through it be created, and a suitable means for receiving this
>> transmitted light elsewhere in space and/or time ? If so, then you
>> have a pretty powerful forecasting system ? Even the weather man
>> might one day be 100% right ! The possibilities are limitless,
>> however I still recognise it may be just a dead-end. By the way, my
>> background is fisheries/aquatic biology. My interest in the area of
>> time travel has been one of quiet observation and possibility
>> dreaming. Thank you for listening. - Brad Skehan
>
>Well, I really don't dwell on time travel much. My only purpose for
>even listing anything on KeelyNet about it was to try to make all the
>claimants out there either shut up or prove that they can really do it
>by a TEST..<g>.
>
>Needless to say, no one has come forward with any test (except for one
>video thing which hasn't been taken up yet) and instead I get some
>criticism from those whose feet have been placed in the fire...they are
>the first to scream when you ask for proof.
>
>Quite content to sell books or videos and I think much relieved because
>people don't DEMAND PROOF....which we should all do as a matter of
>principle.
>
>Now, as far as it goes, I don't know that wormholes would have any
>bearing on time because the descriptions I've heard of them always say
>to think of the universe as a giant rubber sheet, when you fold the
>sheet back around so that two points touch, you now have the ability to
>'fold space and distance' so that you can burrow your way from one side
>to the other without having to travel over the previous vast distance.
>
>Is this your understanding of how a wormhole operates? If so, then it
>is purely a matter of shortening the distance and thus has no bearing on
>time as we currently use the word.
>
>Instead I find the claim of Keely more to the point, that truly 'Time is
>Gravity'....meaning that as we move out into space, we reduce the amount
>of gravity, thus weight that we feel. Why does time slow so radically
>in space? Because there is almost no gravity.
>
>KeelyNet promotes the idea of PUSH GRAVITY using the aether/zpe concept.
>
>We live in a universe of intense and complex energy flows which puts us
>all under a kind of pressure. Matter is basically a hole in space which
>the surrounding aether/zpe is trying to fill back up to achieve
>equilibrium.
>
>So, the larger the mass, the more aether/zpe flows into it. Not only
>does it flow into our bodies but we are TRAPPED in the flows that move
>into the earth...like flies on a screen, stuck by the pressure of wind
>moving against them and through the screen.
>
>If we can deflect the aether/zpe influx around us that normally moves
>into the earth, we can literally reduce our physical weight and even
>negate it to the point that we are NO LONGER CAPTIVE in the influx into
>the earth.
>
>Now, that means if we can figure out how to control the influx of
>aether/zpe into matter, we can literally control the flow of TIME into
>that matter also...to the point that aging is slowed because it is no
>longer linked to the intense high volume flows required by the planet.
>
>That is why people moving in space can be gone a matter of weeks and
>come back with no visible aging, yet a hundred years have passed on the
>earth...why? Because the people on earth are CLOCKED to the earths
>aether/zpe influx....
>
>If people only realized how important this was and what it would entail,
>gravity control, free energy and reducing aging all by learning to
>control the aether/zpe influx, maybe then we could get a patron(ess) or
>two...perhaps its WHO you know..<g>..
>
>However, we work to that end everyday but no one comes forward with
>funding without strings relating to control or greed or wanting to
>capitalize on it, to heck with advancing humanity, so we just work on
>our own.
>
>Basically, as aether/zpe moves through and into matter, it literally
>clocks the aging of the mass....reduce or stop the flow and aging stops.
>
>Now about time, it is that clocking flow into mass.
>
>Now there is a possibility that you could use phase conjugation to move
>a mass back through time so that it could literally regain its youth and
>I've written about that in a file at;
>
>http://www.keelynet.com/time/antitime.htm
>
>but who knows what would happen to such a mass. Say you phase
>conjugated the aether/zpe in the body so that it flowed outward? That
>would be dangerous as all hell....why?
>
>Because it is the influx that produces mass aggregation, whether by
>attracting particles or more correctly by literally MANIFESTING NEW MASS
>due to wave interference to cause the mass to form in the first place
>and grow (aggregate).
>
>Eventually it reaches maturity and the aether/zpe influx reduces to some
>degree because it has grown to its maximum volume/mass....now it begins
>to lose energy and eventually die where it breaks down into its
>constituent components which in turn break down back to the aether/zpe
>form.
>
>So, if you force an emission of aether/zpe you would lose mass and
>possibly die or just fade away..<g>..
>
>Lots of possibilities and my main interest isn't so much for time travel
>per se as it is for healing, rejuvenation and possibly reversing aging.
>
>You know how buoyancy works? What if there is an energy buoyancy also?
>
>That is we live in a reality that has a specific 'ground state' of
>energy. What if you excited a mass to have another ground state and the
>buoyancy principle caused the mass to float up, sink down or somehow
>transport to the same energy level...because the universe always seeks
>equilibrium, with no difference of potential, no polarity.
>
>There was a physicist who the delusional Al Bielek mentions yet who
>really did exist...this guy says that every sun has its own frequency,
>and every planet and mass has its own frequency and that they all clock
>to each other based on WHEN and WHERE THEY WERE BORN.
>
>That means that each planet in our solar system is clocked to our sun
>which is clocked to the galaxy, then the nebula we were born and live
>in.
>
>We too are clocked to the earth and even our physical location. So by
>changing your 'clock frequency' you could possibly move through time.
>
>Much like a computer clock chip which divides down to ever lower
>frequencies to fulfill specific functions of the computer..so too would
>we be entrained and LINKED to these other mainstream clocks.
>
>I have a very unusual privately published book by a fellow named Flotte
>who talks about the Flotte axis which directly correlates with this. He
>indicates that by adjusting a mass to this Flotte axis and tuning it
>properly you could move through space/and or time. I really should get
>back in touch with his son and see if he would let me sell the few books
>that remain or he could sell them, point is make them available. Flotte
>senior died several years ago.
>
>Now physicist Alan Holt says we could use such resonance phenomena to
>literally teleport through space by resonantly coupling to another star
>system and/or planetary body. He calls it Field Resonance Propulsion
>and his papers are on KeelyNet at the following locations;
>
>http://www.keelynet.com/energy/holt1.htm
>http://www.keelynet.com/energy/holt2.htm
>
>My point here is we might be able to induce a specific pattern in a mass
>so that it would literally move back from the present the past.
>
>The trick is how do you go further back than the date the mass was
>originated?
>
>Perhaps use a million year old rock as your reference, then like a comic
>strip with multiple frames, you just select the temporal frames recorded
>in the rock that you want to visit, tune to those frames and go there.
>Once you've made your visit, you return to the rock and tune back to the
>temporal location from whence you came.
>
>There are indications of some for now, mysterious conduit/corridor which
>appears in two forms to my knowledge.
>
>The first is some kind of resonant connection between two resonating
>bodies as seen with electronic dowsing devices. Once the energy path is
>established under power between the source and the target, it remains
>even though the energy source has been removed. Kind of a remanence
>phenomenon like how a firefly will continue to glow after you stop
>stroking it, like an energy bleedoff. We have tested this on numerous
>occasions and are always amazed that the conduit remains long after,
>sometimes several hours.
>
>The second is what appears to be a similar effect first noted by Joe
>Parr and verified by Dan Davidson where energy conduits exist from our
>sun to other suns and which appear at certain times of the year as the
>Earth passes through them in its orbit.
>
>During that time, the conduit can be detected by special gravity wave
>detectors as described in the paper;
>
>http://keelynet.com/davidson/npap1.htm
>
>and in Dan's book Shape Power which is described at;
>
>http://www.keelynet.com/shape.htm
>
>My main concerns are a reliable self-sustaining free energy source and a
>way to control gravity in a mass. Time travel just too far fetched at
>this time and in my opinion, would produce more mischief and possibly
>misery than do any good. So, I'll stick to my guns with F/E and gravity
>control, with the short range permutations which will necessarily result
>from their discovery and FREE release.
>
>Thanks for the email...
>--
> Jerry Wayne Decker / jdecker@keelynet.com
> http://keelynet.com / "From an Art to a Science"
> Voice : (214) 324-8741 / FAX : (214) 324-3501
> KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> with the body text: leave Keelynet
> list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> -------------------------------------------------------------