Re: Electrical verses magnetic fields
Robert Calloway ( (no email) )
Tue, 19 May 1998 19:34:10 -0500
Hello Mathias! Yes, I have read all of Tom Beardens ideas and theories. I'm
just throwing in a little extra in with it! Regards, Robert H. Calloway.
----------
> From: Mathias <telluris@netidea.com>
> To: KeelyNet-L@lists.kz
> Subject: Re: Electrical verses magnetic fields
> Date: Tuesday, May 19, 1998 4:23 PM
>
> Hi Robert at al:
> >
> > Hello All, I've always believed magnetic and electrical fields were
one
> > in the same.
> > I'm not here to try to change the views of most people on that issue
but...
> > Lets dicuss
> > it! So.. lets go all the way back to making electricty with a magnetic
> > field.
> > A magnet is turning inside a coil of wire, so call electrons are
bumping
> > along in the
> > wire carrying a electrical charge to a load. Number 1 question. How are
> > electrons
> > being replaced in the coil after the others have left to a load? If
> > electrons are being
> > replaced from the aether, you should have noticeable effects around
large
> > generators.
> > Question number 2. The electrons are so called "charged" with this
> etc...
>
> In another post subsequent to this one from Hexlinger suggested some
> answer to which -as far as goes my understanding goes- I suscribe to
> "Electrons never enter or leave the circuit - this is the most common
> misconception in all 'electronics', and I think we have our poor
> educational system to blame for it. Electrons merely act as the medium
> to
> pass CHARGE (energy). Energy is the only thing moving in the circuit...
> "
>
> Tom Bearden has written several paper on this and related subjects; you
> can find a good summary of his view at
> http://www.eskimo.com/~ghawk/fogal_device/index.html (look under
> downloadable zip files) in the form of a glossary. I'd suggest to read
> such definition as "ENERGY", "POYNTING, JOHN HENRY", "ENERGY
> COLLECTION/COLLECTING", "ELECTRIC FIELD", "ETHER", ets, etc. It maybe
> usfull to some of you.
>
> Mathias