Re: LET ME ASK MY QUESTION AGAIN SO THAT IT MIGHT GET ANSWERED

ufotruth@ix.netcom.com
Mon, 18 May 1998 14:39:14 -0500 (CDT)

On 05/18/98 18:39:08 you wrote:
>
>Hi William,
>
>Theoretically it would require an infinite amount of energy to accelerate a
>mass to the speed of light (according to relativity theory). Therefore,
>theoretically, it would require 2 times an infinite amount of fuel to
>accelerate a mass vehicle to twice the speed of light. Of course this would
>require a fuel tank at twice as big as the universe.

You are not listening to my question! SCREW THE THEORY OF RELATIVITY! We
know that a space craft can accelerate from 0 to 10 miles per second. So for
this question lets just ASSUME that it is possible to accelerate JUST AS
EASILY (without mass increase, space warping, or time dilation) from 0 to 2
times the speed of light! So without all these things how much fuel would it
take for a craft to accelerate at a constant rate to lets say 2 times the
speed of light? Can you PLEASE give me an answer?

When it comes to this question IGNORE "relativity" with all of its
ridiculous "reference frames", IGNORE "mass increase, and IGNORE "time
dilation"! How much fuel would it take?

>
>Question for you: do you think the universe (our understanding of it) is
>capable of maintaining a relationship (i.e. detection) with a mass
>traveling faster than light speed? If so, how?

Sure it is. Why? Because GENERAL AND SPECIAL RELATIVITY ARE WRONG! They are
RIDICULOUS! Becuase I do not CARE what "einstein" says you do NOT need an
"obsurver" for something to occur! But for this question please lets not get
into relativity and all of that garbadge.

>
>I agree with Hexslinger in that Nature appears to perceive within preset
>bandwidths of detection. We can only see and hear (experience) within
>certain light and sound bandwidths. Perhaps the universe is similar to us,
>or rather we are similar to the universe.

You want to read some very interesting information? Go to the following
webpage.

http://www.autodynamics.org

>
>Bill.
>
>
>At 00:30 18/05/98 -0500, you wrote:
>>Everyone,
>>
>>I am going to ask my question again. If you would please answer it I would
>>greatly appreciate it. In this question lets simply assume that time
>>dilation, mass increase, and space warping does not occur when one
>>accelerates to and past the speed of light. Hey, you might think that I am
>>wrong and that time dilation, mass increase, and/or space warping does
occur
>>when one accelerates to and/or beyond the speed of light. But for this
>>question please just THEORETICALLY assume that these SR and GR things do
not
>>occur....
>>
>>So here is my question.
>>
>>How much fuel would it take for a conventional space craft (rocket or ion)
>>to accelerate at a constant rate of speed to twice the speed of light? How
>>much fuel would it take? Would it be possible to build such a craft?
>>
>>Please answer this question without discussing how it is impossible to
>>travel FTL conventionally.
>>
>>Best Regards,
>>William
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>