Here is a recent post to our contact who has all the fascinating
theories and experiments with the pyromagnetic effect;
-------------------------
I went to lunch with Chuck Henderson yesterday and we were talking about
your pyromagnetic stuff. He said he had worked around some really
powerful air compressors and that you could shoot the air across your
hand and it would get hotter and hotter, to where you would have to stop
or burn yourself. According to Chuck, this high velocity air, in his
own experience does in fact reach high temperatures.
This was news to me as I've only worked around compressors of about
150psi max, with nozzle velocities not much greater than about
80psi...when I've done this many times in the past, it is always cool.
Chuck says the heat generation is also dependent on the amount of
moisture mixed with the air.
So now I understand more clearly how you are saying the pyromagnetic
effect can be achieved with nothing but high velocity air to heat and a
venturi to creation suction that cools.
It does make sense because compression produces heat, expansion produces
cold. And I have felt an air tank that was compressing up to 200 psi
and the tank was hot enough to burn your hand if you kept touching it.
I have no idea at this time what kind of velocity, cubic feet per minute
or acceptable degree of moisture is required to achieve the high
temperature needed for the magnet Curie point, but surely it is written
down in a report somewhere.
So, I am that much more intrigued by your claims that a useful
pyromagnetic effect can be produced using just air. Your additional
correlations to UFO type phenomena, specifically as evinced in the Searl
and Hamel claims where air is definitely moving through the craft at
very high velocity and a glow is produced which has the spectral
characterisitics of heat (red to yellow to white), offers an entirely
new perspective on what might really be their method of propulsion and
power generation.
What puzzles me now is what keeps the air flowing? I can see it
requiring an initial source of energy to achieve a certain velocity,
then, once achieved, it must become self-sustaining and in effect go
into an overunity condition.
A correlation I've noted across many claims has to do with velocity or
energy density. It requires outside energy to achieve either a critical
velocity or energy density (Keely's Push),
then it achieves a level of 'balance' which I liken to resonance where
push equals pull....
if it is accelerated or increased slightly beyond that balance point, it
starts to PULL (as Keely says) and will accelerate ON ITS OWN...
to prevent it from either destroying itself or flying off into space
(because gravity is cancelled and repelled), a govenor needs to be
applied so you can tap off what you need as energy.
(Keely's Push / Balance / Pull in action)
That is another reason the Einstein Unified Field Theory is interesting
since it says that gravity, magnetism, electric force and INERTIA are
all interchangeable...that is why you can achieve this push/pull/balance
effect by increasing the velocity of mass or the density of energy.
Anyway, just wanted to let you know, some of us are still pondering your
pyromagnetic claims and I think you really have an entirely new take on
the production of phenomena using it. I ordered the set of Physics
Experiments books from AMAZON that Terry and John found for $90.00 and
will extract more useful information for website pages...also I will
draw up your faxes...they have already been shared with the Roundtable
group who will in turn pass them on to their contacts.
Thanks for sharing your ideas and experiments, I think you could make a
really interesting presentation and workshop at a conference. Seeya!
-- Jerry W. Decker / jdecker@keelynet.com http://keelynet.com / "From an Art to a Science" Voice : (214) 324-8741 / FAX : (214) 324-3501 KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187