Well, the problem with conventional rockets and thrusters is that they
cannot propel a craft faster than the speed of light. This is because the
closer you get to the speed of light the more mass you accumilate.
Eventually, you are so massive that there would not be enough rocket or
thruster fuel in the universe to propell you any faster.
So if we are to develope space craft in my opinion we need to focus on craft
that can go faster than the speed of light. Unless we can go faster than the
speed of light practical and efficent interstellar space travel will never
be possible. Sure a group of individuals could get on a craft traveling
maybe half the speed of light and travel to the closest star and back but it
would take them 16 years. A sixteen year trip to the closest star and back
would not be practicle for many reasons such as the following: The Ammount
of food, water, and air that would have to be stored on the craft, the
frustration of the crew members being on the same craft for so long, etc.
>From what I have heard an electrogravitic craft would be capable of
traveling faster than the speed of light. You see there is a theory that
states that the reason why an object traveling close to the speed of light
gains mass is because it is passing through more and more of the "aether".
Theoretically, an electrogravitic craft could warp space so it would not be
passing through the aether but diverting it around itself. In this theory
the craft could constantly accelerate without gaining mass.
Right now I think the important thing is that you, we, myself, or someone
builds a model electrogravitic disc that proves that electrogravitics is
real. That is the FIRST thing we need to do. We do not need to worry about
building a craft (although it is very interesting and fun to theorize about
a full scale craft) but we need to just prove the Biefield Brown effect is
real by building model craft(s) to demonstrate to the world. Once we get
model electrogravitic crafts built we would need to demonstrate them all
over the world to FORCE the government to reveal the electrogravitic craft
that they have been developing for the last 50 years or so.
Right now I am seriously considering taking a course in basic electronics so
I can get a job somewhere and learn about electricity so I can try to build
several model craft(s) that utilize the Biefield-Brown effect.
I do have a few questions:
1) In recent history has anyone tried to produce the Biefield-Brown effect
or build an electrogravitic disc? What were there results?
2) How much would a 100KVDC generator cost? I have went to several websites
selling high voltage equipment but I have not found one yet that actually
LISTED the prices of the generators and equipment! What would be a good
place to buy a 100KVDC generator? Could I build one myself?
3) Currently what are the highest "k" dielectric materials that are
resonably affordable? From what I have read the higher the "k" value of the
dielectric the greater the electrogravitic effect.
Thank you very all of your help. Take care and God Bless.
Best Regards,
William
>I haven't actually seen the early T.T.Browm patents but from the
>descriptions that I have read you want the positive charge on the
>leading edge and the negative charge on the trailing edge.
>Think of the negative side as being "uphill" from the positive side.
>The bigger the charge the steeper the hill.
>You may want to supliment the device with a thruster.
>
> ++++ooo############ooo---
> ++++ooo xxxxxooo-*-*-*-
> ++++ooo############ooo---
>
>+++ = positive charge
>--- = negative charge
>ooo = dielectric
>xxx = thruster/generator
>*** = thrust/waste heat
>### = hull
>
>At least that is the design that I am leaning toward, but with using a
>GIT instead of electrogravatics. I may try to use all three pinciples
>at once. Say, a low temp rocket or a turbojet to fire the masses in the
>race at high velocity. Generate the electrogavatics at the same time
>either with the masses being magnetic or direct from the thruster.
>I am running into problems determining power to weight ratio, dielectric
>strength, and material strength of the race.
>
>Any feedback? Grant:?>
>
>