Re: First time on - hopefully not the last!
Bill McMurtry ( weber@powerup.com.au )
Wed, 04 Feb 1998 10:13:07 +1000
At 14:37 3/02/98 -0800, you wrote:
>> I have come up with my own
>> frequency range to try...
>>
>> 44.18704279 MHz - 44.22845598 MHz
>>
>> ...If any one has seen a range like this before I would love to know.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> M.R.
>>
>> If you have yet to see it, check out American Computer Company's "new
>> technology" page at http://www.compamerica.com/roswell.htm.
>
>Hello Matthew Redmond:
>
>I was wandering how you came up with this window of frequencies? I
>dowsed it and, as good as my dowsing may be, this is what I call a Life
>frequency. Or one in tune with the underlying movements that Nature
>uses to build Life (as opposed to anthropic movements). Which leeds me
>to the next point: I think working devices that we call free energy all
>have in common an attunment to these Life giving principles that Nature
>uses. Call them Golden Mean Ratio (1.618..), Self recursive,Phi,
>Fratal... Whether the principle is found in the frequencies generated,
>in the geometrical shape, the internal cristaline structure of the
>material, or in the physical movements themselves, in parts or all of
>the device.
>See Viktor Schauberger, Tom Bearden, Dan Winter, amongst other for more
>info.
>M.P.
>
Hi M.P.
you mention that you think "working devices that we call free energy..."
which ones are these? I've never seen a "working" free energy device and
I've never met anyone who has (a real one anyway). Now I'me certainly not
saying that I never will see such a device - hense my interest in the
subject. BUT, free energy and overunity are at present a THEORETICAL
POSSIBILITY, not an actuality. The "one watt challenge", as put forward by
Hal Puthoff, still stands.
Please don't get me wrong, I'me not bagging you or anyone else exploring
this field (unless they are trying to con), but sometimes I wonder if maybe
the hype is being believed by the very people who need to remain objective.
Bill.