Re: Frequency Controlled Resistance

Dan A. Davidson ( (no email) )
Wed, 28 Jan 1998 09:05:11 -0700

It is well documentated w/ all the requisite experiments that the actual
electron flow in a wire is very slow; HOwever, the energy flow is C. The
energy flow, I believe, is due to the magnetic field around the wire which
acts as a dump conduit for the aetheric charge difference (i.e., the
voltage). When you set up a bifilar arrangement, the mag and electric
fields cancel and the energy is dumped into a pure aetheric stress which
Bearden has named a scalar field. This is actually a misnomer as the
energy has simply been turned into a pure stress. Think of pressing on
both sides of a board with equal force. There is no net movement but the
energy is stored in the board as stress.

The math for all this is in Shape Power.

Dan A. Davidson

At 10:56 PM 1/27/98 -0800, you wrote:
>
>
>On Wed, 28 Jan 1998, Jerry W. Decker wrote:
>
>> These guys said they had found that by injecting various frequencies in
>> wire or into cooling conductive materials, that paths were setup which
>> would have unusually low resistances. They said even overunity was
>> possible but would not say onstage that they had succeeded. Later, I
>> cornered a couple of them and asked a few questions.
>
>Damnit Jerry - there you go being psychic again. :)
>It's funny you should bring this up, since it reminds me alot of an idea
>that I remember reading somewhere -- the idea was that: current flowing
>through a conductor does *NOT* flow at a fixed rated -- but rather various
>flows are set up at various DEPTHS in the conductor. Essentially, the
>conductor becomes one giant waveguide - with different... um... I don't
>quite know how to put it... uhh... "conduction bands" -- bands of charge
>travelling at different speeds -- forming layers around the center --
>which matches the wave conventional waveguides work for air or water.
>
>I'll take "things that make you go 'hmmmm'" for $100, Jerry...
>it makes you wonder if this difference in the flow can be engineered?
>If you were to treat conductive wiring as a conventional waveguide,
>then surely there must be a way to create a path of the lowest possible
>resistance.
>
>Speculation, anyone?
>
>
>
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------
|| Come ride The River ------- http://www.theriver.com/ ||
------------------------------------------------------------