Mass (i.e., atoms) have aether flowing into and out of them continuously.
Inertia is the result of starting the mass to move in a different direction
so the aether flows have to get oriented in that direction. Thus, once a
mass gets moving in a given direction it wants to stay moving in that
direction since the aether is now flowing in that direction thru the mass.
To make a mass go antigravitic the aether flows have to be manupulated.
Advance Yogis can control the aetheric flows and levitate at will. The
breathing lift expt does the same thing. Breath control is the basic secret
to the whole levitation expt w/ people. this is also why intertia and mass
are the same numberically.
Dan A. Davidson
At 01:00 AM 1/28/98 -0800, you wrote:
>Hi Bill!
>
>You wrote;
>> Where did the weight of the spinning mass go as it was lifted with
>> ease?
>
>It is puzzling. I think it has something to do with gyroscopic
>precession...there are claims as with the Dean Drive that indicate a
>spinning weight can be redirected in a given direction to cause the mass
>to push away.
>
>Dr. Harold Aspden did an experiment which indicates that aether actually
>couples to mass, like velcro hooks that seep into and hold static
>masses...(my interpretation)....when the mass spins, these velcro hooks
>are partially broken to allow the mass to accelerate to speed....that is
>the resistance/inertia that must be overcome to get the mass spun up TO
>that speed.
>
>I won't quote the experiment just yet because I have it in the old VSRT
>Plenum newsletters that I am planning to put online. Essentially, he
>measured how much energy it took to get a mass rotating to a certain
>speed....then he would bring this to a stop....he did this over and over,
>to make sure the electrical energy requirement was very nearly the same
>in each test.
>
>Then he brought the heavy rotating mass to a 'near stop', then
>accelerated it again...when accelerated in this fashion, it only took
>about 30% of the energy necessary to go from a FULL STOP to full
>velocity, than it had before....he repeated this several times and it
>always came out the same....it ties in very well with Puthoffs paper on
>'ZPE as the Cause of Inertia'.
>
>IMHO, there is something going on with gravity deflection, perhaps
>chopping the 'field lines' of gravity as it flows into the earth. Kind of
>like an umbrella. Of course the mass has gravity flowing into it, but
>that justs hold it together, it is the flow of gravity into the earth
>that gives it what we erroneously call 'weight'. That's why the Aspden
>comment about being measured on a scale while lifting this gyroscope
>showed a decrease in overall weight....see, we have all kinds of clues,
>just need to get off our butts and figure out how to scale this effect
>up....
>--
> Jerry W. Decker / jdecker@keelynet.com
> http://keelynet.com / "From an Art to a Science"
> Voice : (214) 324-8741 / FAX : (214) 324-8741
> KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------
|| Come ride The River ------- http://www.theriver.com/ ||
------------------------------------------------------------