Well said...
Math is not one of my strong points.
-BAP
Kenneth Carrigan wrote:
>
> Jer,
> I have to laugh! What a slip... but so true!
> >I loved your Freudian slip with this quote;
> >> This is the proper way research projects should go... theory,
> >> HYPNOSIS, experiment and results - then loop back around for
> >> revisions.
>
> >Check out; http://keelynet.com/energy/aethrtap.htm
> > http://keelynet.com/energy/prentice.htm
> >
> <<snip>>
> >A few of us will do this project this summer. Notice he says you need a
> >high voltage source to initialize the circulating current. We have
> >several people in our Roundtable who have large areas of land that would
> >let us do either 1/2 mile or 1 mile....we will videotape it and report
> >fully on our failure...woops, damned hypnosis, SUCCESS!!!
>
> Well I read it and think it is just a transformer. I really did not see
> mention
> of disconnecting the source when extracting the 300W of power.
>
> Essentually what is accomplished is the making of a traveling wave long
> wire antenna. A long wire is one that is greater than one-half wavelength
> long. A very narrow antenna pattern can result (20 degrees or so) with
> all the power radiated. Now place a tuned antenna near the radiation
> and you have an effiecient transformer. Here is a approximation for
> expressing the angle of maximum radaition: cos-1(1-(.371/(L/lambda))).
> The radiation resistance of a traveling wave wire antenna is typically
> 200 to 300 ohms and the termination resistance should equal this for
> for maximum power transference.
>
> Anyhow, that just my two cents on it. His theory basis is not valid for
> energy to be emitted:
>
> "In an Electricial Power Accumulator, a syncronized oscillatory circuit
> having same frequency as the earth generated currents, said circuit parallel
> with and in proximity to the earth, said circuit adapted to accumulate and
> utilize current generated by the earth rotating on ist axis. "
>
> v/r Ken Carrigan