RE: Question about the aether

Peter Ammon ( pa44@cornell.edu )
Wed, 5 Apr 2000 11:53:12 -0400

>
>What I could use is some help in proofing the equations that addresses
>the Faraday generator which could maybe be made to produce overunity
>if the equations proof out. In my field I first like to make up
>a hypothesis and then conduct experiments around that. My web
>site (1997) never was finished and left it with some errors in
>relating kinetic energy to potential energy. I might add gross
>errors? 95,000% overunity? <g> However, if someone can complete
>the equations and address friction energy loss and relate it
>to normal operational parameters, then maybe this generator can
>be built. One can build many many many Faraday generators and
>not get overunity, why not look at the physical laws first and
>see if there is potential in allowing 'free energy'.
>http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Hangar/5307/Principles.htm

Hi Ken! I read your article, and I believe that you made a mistake when
calculating the direction of the force via the Biot-Savart law. Let's draw
a disk on a piece of paper rotating counterclockwise with the magnetic
field coming out of the paper. Examining the top of the disk, the velocity
of the particles is left and the magnetic field is out, so by the right
hand rule, the force on a positive particle is up, and therefore so is the
current. Applying the Biot Savart law with the right hand rule again on
the top of the disk, we see that if the current is up and the magnetic
field is out of the paper, then the force on the disk will be to the right,
not out of the paper as your article claims. In other words, the magnetic
field will exert a force on the disk that is tangent to the disk and in the
opposite direction from the rotation. Therefore, the two brushes cannot be
used to cancel out the force, because they will exert the torque in the
same direction on the disk.

This jives with conservation of energy; if the disk rotates through a
magnetic field, then it makes current, and that energy has got to come from
somewhere, so it comes from the angular kinetic energy of the disk.

Let me know if you have any questions or disagreements about this flaw.
Good luck on any future theories.

-Peter

-------------------------------------------------------------
To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
with the body text: leave Interact
list archives and on line subscription forms are at
http://keelynet.com/interact/
-------------------------------------------------------------