> I began to wonder last night if people have been viewing batteries the
> wrong way. Perhaps, if Mr. Bearden is correct, and the batteries' energy
> potential can be perpetually replenished as long as electrical eqilibrium
is
> avoided, then perhaps a battery is more than just a provider of electrons.
Just think about the 100,000 scientist and chemists that are experts in
research, design and making of batteries. From Nickel Metal Hydride to
to lead acid, to carbon zinc. There are lots of different batteries even
the fuel cell type. This stems way back from Voltaire experiments with
frog legs and electrical stimulation's. There is so much history in battery
technology and now with electric cars making battery technology such a
HOT topic.. the Navy has an Information Exchange Agreement(IEA) with the
U.K. on JUST BATTERY R&D to increase and capture 6.1 type of basic
research on Batteries. I can't even imagine what they are talking about
or addressing but it is a very very highly visible program.
> The battery as an energy releasing diode... This may explain why the
> capacitors calloway used wouldn't run the motor as the battery did.
> They don't have the same access to this energy. All they do is collect
> electrons.
The battery is an electro chemical reaction where the relationships
between electrical current and chemical change are given by Faraday and
his laws... which are/have been tested, by experiments over and over and
over, and found to be valid. Once a law is found to be valid FROM concrete
tests.. it is set in stone until someone can (by experiment) modify it
and show or prove that he can satisfy the FORMER law by his new law AND
account for the new experiments which prove the new law. Never is an
old law thrown out, just modified, as validation for the old law still
always will exist. Surmising a new law is NOT allowed. Until someone
can prove the Aether, which many have tried and failed, there are no laws
that allow for it, no experiments that can account for it, and thus not
allowed to be talked about in mainline science, except that there is no
Aether concept.. as tests have proven. A battery is not a diode, just
as a diode is not a battery.
> Perhaps, rather than "recharging" the batteries with the coils in the
> motor, the back spikes are pulling strongly enough to "un-clog" those
> parts of the battery that are responsible for channeling that energy,
> allowing the battery to continue accessing and passing on the EM
potential,
> keeping it away from the deadly eqilibrium it's electrons are seeking.
Take for example the lead acid battery. You run your car on a new battery
without an alternator until it just quits running. The Battery may read at
that point 8 volts instead of the 12.5 or so that it should read. Now
wait for about an hour and OH MY! It now reads 11 volts! FREE ENERGY?
Recharge from Aether? NO! It is still the chemical reaction in the
battery which is taking place. Now take a carbon zinc battery and try
to do the same.. doesn't really work? OH? No Aether recharge in it?
No the chemical reactions are a little different. Just as a carbon zinc
can not be recharged and a nickel cadmium can be recharged.
Where is the solid evidence to change the battery 'concept' of chemical
reactions providing current to Aether recharge? Where are the tests that
validate this? Recharging by itself without ruling out the chemistry of
the cell is totally inadequate.
v/r Ken Carrigan
Electromagnetic Engineer
Go Maxwell!
-------------------------------------------------------------
To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
with the body text: leave Interact
list archives and on line subscription forms are at
http://keelynet.com/interact/
-------------------------------------------------------------