Need more detail or discussion on this from GEET users...
MIT uses only fuel to break the hydrogen out of gasoline and
reinjects it into the cylinders. They also use somehow plasma
to break the molecular bonds.
v/r Ken Carrigan
-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry Wayne Decker [mailto:jwdatwork@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2000 11:23 AM
To: interact@keelynet.com
Subject: Re: Gunnerman A-55 30-50% water to fuel mix
Hi Chuck et al!
No reason in particular that I'm not stuck on GEET as
the only option...I know Paul and I think he's great
but the web is swamped with stuff about GEET.
With so much being available about GEET these days,
why join the herd and further confuse the issue?
I much prefer the lesser known material that needs to
see the light of day and hopefully get picked up,
copied and experimented with...
Lots of ways to skin a cat.
You seem to be particularly fixated on GEET..<g>...not
my business to ask why but its just there is SO MUCH
out there about it and a lot of people marketing it as
franchise distributor and all that jazz.
Some of the MANY sites;
www.geet.com/
www.friend.ly.net/GEET/
www.onelist.com/archive/geet-vortex-carb
members.xoom.com/jlnlabs/geet/html/geetdiag.htm
members.xoom.com/jlnlabs/geet/html/geetplans.htm
members.tripod.com/professor_shields/geet.htm
www2.ios.com/~cnfrmtn9/geet.html
and on and on and on...
We have MORE than covered GEET as per KeelyNet posts
at;
Geet is mentioned twice in this water/fuel doc;
http://www.keelynet.com/energy/gunnhist.htm
Twice mentioned - Naudins experiment with GEET and
free GEET conversion plans at;
http://www.keelynet.com/index99.htm
and the posts on this very discussion list are at;
http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet/m8187.html
and it came up with 31 OTHER mentions of GEET, so I
don't understand why you think its not sufficiently
covered.
Sounds like you need to start a GEET discussion list
so you can fill up on it..<g>..for hoots, looked it up
and guess what came up, a post to THIS discussion list
recommending the GEET discussion list as at;
http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet/m6425.html
You must not have received the email threatening
repercussions for anyone who talked about GEET
publicly...<g>...JUST KIDDING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
--- chuck's corner <farrar@together.net> wrote:
> Jerry,
> ?
> curious..... I know I was able to reach you with an
> earlier post..is there a reason why people (and you
> as well it would seem) have been quite close-lipped
> about the Geet fuel processor or its potential place
> in our present predicament regarding fuel prices...?
> or is there another reason I'm not aware of....? I
> for one find it remarkable but am having to re-
> evaluate my 'conventional wisdoms' regarding engines
> as this controls fuel consumption as well as heat by
> restricting flow ....
=====
=================================
Please respond to jdecker@keelynet.com
as I am writing from my work email of
jwdatwork@yahoo.com.........thanks!
=================================
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
with the body text: leave Interact
list archives and on line subscription forms are at
http://keelynet.com/interact/
-------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
with the body text: leave Interact
list archives and on line subscription forms are at
http://keelynet.com/interact/
-------------------------------------------------------------