HERESY! I'll have you know the 'tooth fairy' is a
personal friend of mine who lives in Oaklawn...a very
colorful part of Dallas..<g>....
Just kidding and yep I noticed that too, there are
lots of holes in the theory because;
1) neutrinos RARELY are DETECTED
but couldn't that mean our detectors are not sensitive
enough to pick up this wideband saturation....could
there not be some other material or method to detect
them?
2) they do tend to 'accumulate' around matter
even then not with sufficient density that we can
detect to explain gravity, though one of the pages
does have the calculations indicating there is a
correlation between gravity 'pressure' and a neutrino
background...
The idea below intrigues me because waves would be
conjugatable(sp)?
> > If neutrinos cause gravity, naturally gravity
> > waves are merely waves of neutrinos.
--- Stephen Brummitt <dev@icx.net> wrote:
> Jerry,
>
> While, there is at first some temptation to accept
> this theory at face value; it takes little
> reasoning, to uncover the gaping holes it it's
> foundation.
>
> This fella's theories, are not quite in-line, with
> all that is known about gravity; as tested by the
> the scientists, at the Fermi Lab.
>
> Even the tried (and, seemingly) 'TRUE' experiment,
> by Gallileo's, has been proven to have it's flaws;
> according to their findings.
>
> The feather, and the lead weight DO NOT fall at
> equal rates of descent, in a vacuum.
>
> THE FEATHER FALLS FASTER !!!
Yes, Eotvos and others seem to have proven that, which
even now isn't to my knowledge included as standard
physics in classrooms.
> Very minutely faster, but faster, 'none the less'.
>
> So, how does that square with the 'stuff', from this
> guy's 'theory', of a neutrino based
> gravitational 'Constant'?
>
> From whence, is all this gravitational 'pressure'
> coming; which is supposed to be the 'cause' of
> the 'effect', that we call 'gravity'?
Several of the papers refer to solar, stellar and
plasma emissions.
> That any direct pressure, asserted upon a given
> mass, from such collisions, would provide such a
> negligible amount of pressure, as to be
> statistically insignificant !
I almost NEVER post the entire page, only excerpts so
looks like you missed the calculations that challenges
that.
> What then, is their method / mechanism of exerting,
> that supposed 'pressure'?
As proved by the experiment in Hawaii, they appear to
have mass BECAUSE they move in waves.
> And, if there are SO MANY of the little buggers
> flying DIRECTLY at one another, as to be able to
> provide equal pressure, in ALL DIRECTIONS, then why
> do we NOT see cataclysmic collisions, providing
> spectacular explosions in the the night sky, at all
> points in space, at one time or another? That alone
> is enough, to nip this theory 'in the bud', for me.
Refer to the other quote from the article about
randomness of creation.
> AND, if all these neutrinos are supposed to
> 'do-their-thing', by exerting some sort of hands-off
> pressure; AND 'that', on the greater mass, MORE SO
> than the lesser (it, being so much smaller of a
> target to hit), then, why does the feather fall
> faster than the lead weight?
What size was the feather and the weight, were they
identical in physical size and thickness?? Check this
out;
> > Neutrinos transfer momentum evenly throughout the
> > full thickness of matter, so that the gravity on
> > any particular portion of matter is relatively
> > small.
Sounds like a neat test, a simulacrum of a real
feather made into a lead feather, then drop them at
the same time...
Check out this piece of weirdness that I meant to
mention...
> > In the late 1950s Goldhaber discovered the left-
> > handed spin of neutrinos. "Neutrinos," he once
> > wrote, "induce courage in theoreticians and
> > perseverance in experimenters."
http://www.keelynet.com/gravity/gyroag.htm
And in a curious twist, the anti-gravity only appeared
when the gyroscope was spinning anticlockwise.
-----------------------------
Hmmmm, left hand spin of neutrinos.....hmmmm, CCW
produces reduced weight in a gyroscope....hmmmmm...
=====
=================================
Please respond to jdecker@keelynet.com
as I am writing from my work email of
jwdatwork@yahoo.com.........thanks!
=================================
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
with the body text: leave Interact
list archives and on line subscription forms are at
http://keelynet.com/interact/
-------------------------------------------------------------