SWB wrote:
> Hello, DRA,
>
> A few quick questions and comments on your last post.
>
> DRA wrote:
> >
> > In the premier issue of Poptronix (P.E. + E.N.), There is an
> > interesting article claiming that a wave reflected off a phase
> > conjugated mirror (PCM) effictivly generates a time reversal wave...
> > now, how can a mirror vibrating, in phase, at 2x the source wave
> > reverse time? does that imply that shifting the phase and/or frequincy
> > could cause a time advancement wave? or better yet, a time stopping
> > wave?
>
> I think I need to subscribe to that mag; I had not heard of it. Is that
> a 'recent' premier'. Or, has it been sitting on your shelf for a while?
>
> > It seems to me that time is ultimately a constant, and any precived
> > shift is due to a change in the surounding frequencies.
> And, I think you may have a few of your perceptions backward, or at the
> very least misaligned.
>
> Welllllll, No. Not really! Time is not a constant. In our little corner
> of the universe, time is perceived to be 'fairly constant'. But, just as
> light itself has not been "truly" 'tacked down' as being constant,
> neither has time or gravity, or any specific rung on the
> 'electromagnetic spectrum'; as they can ALL be stretched, or compressed
> in much the same way. Only different! But, different enough, that we can
> distinguish specific characteristics, actions, reactions, and
> interactions, in order to give those specific things names.
>
> Time is truly 'flexible' and that is NOT just a perception. If time, or
> it's measurability were just perceptions, rather than a 'precept'; then
> the physical world would be a MUCH different place, than we know it. As
> Charles Shultz once had Linus say: "Time is God's way, of keeping
> everything from happening, all at once!" I often wonder if Charles
> knows, just how profound that statement is, as applied to the basic
> understanding of 'how things really work'.
>
> I will pick up a couple of other points, on each of these topics,
> further on down; as I give my intermittent explanations.
>
> i.e. an
> > airplane traveling faster than ... is being bombarded with
> > particles/waves that, and due to the dopler (sp?) effect, causes an
> > increase in the molecular resonance of the airplane and its contents;
> > including say.. a cesium clock tht would appear to have advanced in time
> > compared to one that was on the ground.
>
> You are on a very interesting track, and to a very limited degree, there
> are indeed waves involved, (in an 'overall, interdependent,
> multidimensional, harmonic manner'); but, you have allowed your
> conclusions, to get WAY ahead' of the facts! And, you're about to
> de-rail! (That spelling is "doppler", by the way.)
>
> I believe you have that backwards, it is the moving clock, which would
> register a slower time - 'relative to', stationary clocks on the earth.
>
> I have been preparing a post, that I will send soon; which I hope you
> will find informative, and very helpful, in putting all of these
> concepts together. I really concentrate on 'Definitions' of basic
> premises. This list could really use some standardization of terms, to
> distinguish, one paradigm from another. As it is now, most everyone here
> can say something in a general manner, using the definitions they have
> in their head; yet they are really being interpreted in a multitude of
> ways, by the others on the list, who have radically different,
> definitions in their own mental databases. I believe I can help 'a lot'
> in this area, on several levels; as well as help communicate my own
> theories in a manner, that will be understood, the way I need them to be
> interpreted, for others to see how things work together in my paradigm.
> Whether anyone chooses to agree, or disagree with me; until we are all
> on the same 'frequency (so-to-speak), accurate and efficient
> communication of our thoughts, is really impossible. And, that doesn't
> really happen here on a regular basis. NO slur, just an observation.
>
> > can anyone recomend a detector circut capible of generating a phase
> > locked loop with the earth's 7.xHz or 11.xHz resonance that i could send
> > through a frequincy doubler, amplify it, and finally pass it through a
> > PCM type transducer? I guess the hard part would be impedance matching
> > the system.
>
> I will forward your request on to a gentleman, who may be able to help
> in that regard; but, he is very busy, traveling the world, consulting on
> some mind boggling electronic projects. Don't know when, or if he can
> get to your problem.
> At the last inventor's meeting he presented his latest 'thing', which is
> helping to develop the patent on 'plasma antennas', for stealth
> applications. Really simple, but heady stuff! Basically, it's modulating
> the plasma in a set of parabolic shaped 'neon like' tubes, of horizontal
> and vertical arrays, to both send and receive short burst digital
> communications. Then, when it is turned off, the antenna 'disappears'
> for all intents, and purposes! Glass tubes don't show up on radar!
>
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
> > with the body text: leave Interact
> > list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> > http://keelynet.com/interact/
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
> with the body text: leave Interact
> list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> http://keelynet.com/interact/
> -------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
with the body text: leave Interact
list archives and on line subscription forms are at
http://keelynet.com/interact/
-------------------------------------------------------------