Re: H2O Fuel

Ardvark ( (no email) )
Mon, 15 Nov 1999 00:34:47 -0000

Water can be purified, that is not the problem though, water cannot be
split efficiently into hydrogen and oxygen, the amount of energy needed is
greater than the potential energy produced, I am sorry, but that is a fact.
Internal combustion engines are extremely inefficient energy
converters, and given the fact that it takes more energy to produce the fuel
than the potential energy of the fuel I would say this is a lose-lose
situation.
Sorry if I seem less than optimistic, but I am just being practical.
Ardvark.
ardvark@easynet.co.uk
----- Original Message -----
From: Mike Johnston <enki@csrlink.net>
To: <TMCCOY1@FAIRVIEW.ORG> Interact <Interact@Keelynet.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 1999 8:02 PM
Subject: Re: H2O Fuel

> Hi Tom,
> Unfortunately I have found that there seems to be quite a bit of
> misinformation out there about this subject. Your response illustrates
> one of these points. Your assertion is plain wrong. Actually, pure,
> distilled water is a very poor conductor of electricity and so not
> suitable for use by itself.
> It is true that pure water would be more desirable because it
> doesn't carry with it any pollutants like limestone, mud or sewage
> because these things would tend to collect in your electrolysis cell as
> precipitates and mess things up.
> What is required is the addition of an electrolyte such as sodium
> chloride to the distilled water so that it works. If you don't believe
> me try it yourself. I have.
> For my experiment I used a commercially available 6 pack cooler made
> of non conducting PVC plastic as the electrolysis cell. I filled it with
> tap water and used rock salt as the electrolyte. For electrodes I used a
> couple of steel wrenches. For a power source I used a 12v motorcycle
> battery charger, plugged into a standard 120v wall outlet. It produced
> nice steady streams of H2 and O2 gas.
> MJ
> There is one thing that I see wrong with this using of water as a fuel.
> You have to have PURE water with no extras. Currently on this planet we
> have more sources of non pure water than we do for PURE water. If we
> ever do use water as a fuel it had better be able to use contaminated
> water.[it can]
>
> tom
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
> with the body text: leave Interact
> list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> http://keelynet.com/interact/
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>

-------------------------------------------------------------
To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
with the body text: leave Interact
list archives and on line subscription forms are at
http://keelynet.com/interact/
-------------------------------------------------------------