Noticed this odd post to the alt.sci.physics.new-theories newsgroup
which says that a magnetic pendulum will swing more slowly than an
non-magnetic pendulum.
Now that is quite an interesting observation and correlates with Dr.
Erwin Saxl's experiments with electrified pendulums and Don Kelly's
gravity drop experiments using energized and non-energized moebius
coils. The guy says he did in fact do a test of this and the magnet as
a pendulum DID swing slower...hmm...how can we use this for something
practical?
---------------------
Subject: Magnetic Force Explained By Second Mass Dimension. SENSATIONAL!
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 22:40:30 GMT
From: Rabbo@large..(Rabbo)
Organization: Customer of Telstra Big Pond Direct
Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics.new-theories, sci.physics
Some readers have been a little sceptical about my suggestion that there
is more than one mass and time dimension. Well read this!
For centuries the strange forces between bar magnets have been a source
of mystery and intrigue. Action at a distance, particuluarly through
vacuum, doesn't conform to our normal experience.
According to my new theory, when a bar of iron is magnetised, a flow of
M2 (2nd mass dimension) particles is generated. This flow follows the
well known 'lines of force', entering at one end of the bar and exiting
at the other.
The particles continue to circulate, virtually forever, because there is
nothing to stop them.
This is rather analogous to having a pump installed in the bar,
continuously forcing the M2 fluid out one end and sucking into the other
- with no overall loss of fluid.
M2 particles can possess momentum but are not affected by gravity and so
don't show up as weight. When similar poles are pointed towards each
other, the particles collide in perfectly elastic collisions, giving
rise to repulsive forces. Consideration of the distortion of lines of
forces reveals this, irrespective of which pair of like poles are facing
each other.
Unlike poles are attracted because the lines of force are now deflected
away from the centre region to the ends of the bars. Put simply, a
lowering of M2 pressure occurs in the middle, whilst extra lines are
produced at the extremities.
Forces are a consequence of any change in direction of the particles,
just as with any fluid flow.
No resultant force is exerted on a bar magnet because M2 does not react
with M1, our standard mass dimension.
Now here's the crunch! M2 possesses inertial mass but not gravitational.
Therefore a piece of matter known to contain M2, should not obey Newtons
laws.
There should be a difference in G, for instance, between iron or copper
and manetized iron. Whether or not iron contains M2 intrinsically or not
can be revealed by comparing iron with magetised iron.
A way to test this theory is to compare the period of a simple pendulum
using similar sized and shaped masses of ordinary and magnetized
material as end weights. According to my theory, a swinging bar magnet
should oscillate more slowly because the added inertia attributed to the
M2 is not balanced by a proportional increase in gravitational force.
I performed the experiment with the necessary controls and, guess what,
THE THEORY WAS VERIFIED. THE MAGNET SWUNG MORE SLOWLY THAN ANY OTHER
MATERIAL!
Now can I have that Nobel prize?
Rabbo
-- Jerry Wayne Decker - jdecker@keelynet.com http://www.keelynet.com from an Art to a Science Voice : (214)324-8741 - FAX : (214)324-3501 KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187------------------------------------------------------------- To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com> with the body text: leave Interact list archives and on line subscription forms are at http://keelynet.com/interact/ -------------------------------------------------------------