>Now, when we drag in Searl and Hamel, both of which report the
>production of a spinning plasma around their models once they have been
>in operation for a few minutes, only then do they take off according to
>the reports.
Having thought about this aspect, I`m now asking myself a simple question:
Would these guys have been able to distinguish "red light, sparks and heat"
as produced in plasma from "red light, sparks and heat" as produced by
enormously high eddy currents circulating in the metal surrounds....
I don`t know about Searle, but Hamel wasn`t actually there when it melted
down - he only noted its effects from _outside_ the shack. Even if he had
been there, he wouldn`t have had time to carefully measure the phenenomenon
to make the distinction between eddy-current meltdown and plasma-meltdown.
I now think the former is much more likely - thoughts anyone?
In any event, we`d be wise not to be too dogmatic about plasma until we
have one of these beasts in a controlled envronment.
Nick
------------------------------------------------------
"That which a man cannot afford to lose owns him"
------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
with the body text: leave Interact
list archives and on line subscription forms are at
http://keelynet.com/interact/
-------------------------------------------------------------