Speed of Light

Slavek Krepelka ( slavek.krepelka@sympatico.ca )
Sun, 15 Aug 1999 11:37:17 -0400

Hi Warren,

we are obviously on the same track, except that I am skinning the cat
with an entirely different knife.

Concerning E=mCC. The thing may hold truth as long as only the what I
call the first order of quantum phenomena is concerned, i.e. photons,
electrons, neutrons etc. It is the same order in which the Law of
Entropy holds truth. But the behavior of color in refraction of light
says that there is at least one more and lower order to the wave
function of a photon and this seems to be totally missed by QM, as well
as Newton and Relativities. In this order, the Entropy is ballanced, in
this order you can find the reason for what you people call strong
force, and what Relativities call vacuum.

Again, I cannot argue math, but I can argue the principles any time.
This brings us to Young's experiment. The water wave as drawn in
textbooks looks great when drawn on paper, but when you run it in
reality, there is no interference pattern at all even with a single
frequency wave. You would have to stop the waves and start to move water
along them. This means that photons are particles and that these
particles have wave-frequency property as individuals. Young is one of
the crucial examples of gross misinterpretation of an experiment. That
is why the photon counters count photons and not light.

The idea that only electron will absorb and radiate a photon is not
quite correct. It will do in case of emitted electron, but when we start
talking about matter of a material structure, this property belongs to a
closed valence bond and closed valence bond does not identify with an
electron. That is where the shortfall of QM lies. QM treats free
emissions and radiations in the same way it treats material particulate
disregarding that the mutual relationships within material change the
conditions and therefore properties of that particulate.

That is why you do not understand that quark is one third of a photon
string (better said chain) and that its charm and color is given by its
relationship (distortion) with the rest of matter. That one third is
your 1/3 spin.

In my world of physics, every photon and electron has its own major and
minor wave and frequency. It also has major and minor amplitude
disregarded by everyone I have ever encountered in my searches. That
major amplitude is the answer to the forbidden question: Where is the
electron when it jumps its orbits.

If you calculate your photon "electron" absorption using white light,
you are averaging the photon energies against energy of your standard
electron and you get your number.
That number is mean in two respects. First it is an average, and second
it misleads you being an average compared to the average of a standard
electron principles. You thing you got some concrete result.

In analogy; once you know the distances and speeds of trains along with
the layout of the tracks, you can calculate absolutely perfectly where
they are going to be at any given time. What you cannot calculate is
what makes those trains run. You are finding out the schedule. Not that
it is not important, but it is only a part of the story, same as my way
is only a part of the story.

Regards Slavek.