-----Original Message-----
From: Russell Garber <RussG@mtlusa.com>
To: Interact@Keelynet.com <Interact@Keelynet.com>
Date: Tuesday, August 10, 1999 12:31 PM
Subject: Re: What power generators, etc don't use magnets?
>Yes, I agree. If anyone has seen the movie Phenomenon, they touch upon the
>subject of comparing Solar Panels with Photosynthesis.
>As for over-unity, I have always beleived that it would be possible to
achieve
>over-unity by combining different forces, and different methods of power
>generation. When I was liitle, I looked up perpetual motion in one of
those
>"How Things Work" encyclopedias and read about why it was supposedly
>imposible. The answer was always that the forces would always cancel each
>other out (conservation of energy), but I always thought different because
I
>beleived that you could the use different properties of different forces to
>avoid the conseration of energy restrictions, and still get perpetual
motion as
>the device would run forever without any input of electricity.
>
>I always beleived that it would be possible using magnets and gravity
together
>to achive perpetual motion, and indeed it does work. I have made devices
that
>work on this principle and have discoved that others have as well, as seen
in
>S.M.O.T.. It is kind of funny that one example in the book, of a perpetual
>motion machine that did not work was, the old idea of pulling a steel ball
up a
>ramp with a magnet, and letting it drop before it reached the top to achive
>perpetual motion. The reason given for why it would not work was, that if
the
>magnet were strong enough to pull the ball up the ramp, then it would not
allow
>the ball to drop. But it seemed obvious to me that moving an object up a
slope
>definately required less energy than trying to lift the object straight up,
>therfore the ball would by able drop, and not to mention using several
magents
>instead of one large magnet at the top would help with this process. Even
>though the overall magnetic force is stronger at the top of the ramp (which
>makes the ball move up the ramp), the force at the top of the ramp need not
be
>very strong, and because it is not very strong, and becauase there is also
a
>weak magnetic force pulling from the bottom, this helps gravity to be able
to
>pull the ball straight down through the hole, allowing the ball to drop.
Isn't
>this perpetual motion? If so, it is easily demonstratable, so how can
anyone
>not beleive that it is possible?
>
>I also beleive as mentioned above that over-unity is possible by combining
>different methods of power generation. For example (although not a great
>example and over-simplified), using something like an electric car, and
adding
>widmill style devices, to generate power from the wind created when the car
is
>moving, and other such things so that the overall energy generated is more
>that that which is fed to the system.
>
>Anyway, I was very happy to discover this website, and find a place where
>these ideas are discussed, and experimented with. I wish I had found it
>sooner, but I had always searched the web using Perpetual Motion as the key
>words, which turned up unwanted websites, and only recently discover the
term
>over-unity while searching for something completely different, which turned
up
>this website and others with similair interests.
>
>Keep the ideas coming, and let us help move this country into future as it
>should allready be, whether Big Brother likes it or not.
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
> with the body text: leave Interact
> list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> http://keelynet.com/interact/
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>