Also found this interesting comment about very, very high speed
photographs finding most peculiar images;
http://www.keelynet.com/vsrtnews/apr95.htm
A recent Scientific American article (February 1995, 50 and 100 Years
Ago, page 8) had a fascinating quote from a February 1945 SciAm;
"A photographic technique has been worked out that is so sensitive it
could presumably take a picture of a ghost, if there actually were such
things. This new process, utilizing an illuminating flashlight with an
exposure of less than one millionth of a second, photographs things
which are INVISIBLE, such as the finest details of air disturbances even
to the extent of making an image of a heat wave rising from the palm of
one's hands."
It struck a chord because of the amazing photographs of Dr. Edgerton and
others in high speed flash photography, particularly the odd comment
about being able to take a picture of a ghost. In many UFO cases where
clear photographs have been produced, the person who took the photo does
NOT remember seeing anything odd or unusual at the location or time of
the photo. In those few cases where the 'entities' have explained what
is happening, such as the Meier case, we are told their ships have been
altered to vibrate in slices of our time frames, making them invisible
to our 'normal' perceptions.
The human eye needs a minimum of 24 frames per second to produce a
relatively smooth transition from frame to frame without flicker. So
what happens between those frames? The late Itzhak Bentov called it a
flicker on, flicker off existence. Does the universe or just the local
environment recreate itself each time our consciousness is directed
towards it? Probably neither. It makes more sense to envision two
alternate ways of thinking about it.
One where a second is chopped up into innumerable slices, the other
where there are other 'phases' of existence, otherwise known as
dimensions. This follows the claims of quantum realities as discussed in
the Incunabula files (INCUNAB1 & INCUNAB2 & ONGSHAT on KeelyNet). The
point here is that a camera taking a photograph does NOT have the same
flicker on, flicker off of human 'sense based perceptions' (a Walter
Russell term) and so can pick up activity that is invisible to us.
When a camera is set for the base shutter, it keeps the film exposed for
as long as the shutter is kept manually opened, capturing very slow
movements. A fast exposure, if it happens to hit the correct portion of
the phased temporal reality, could very well capture an 'invisible'
event. All the digital systems are controlled by a clock or fixed
oscillator that necessarily chops up any frequencies that are being
sampled. This is one of the reasons digital multimeters cannot be used
as accurate measuring tools for some circuits, such as over-unity or
F/E.
-- Jerry Wayne Decker / jdecker@keelynet.com http://keelynet.com / "From an Art to a Science" Voice : (214) 324-8741 / FAX : (214) 324-3501 KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187