Re: Tunguska Affair

Theo Paijmans ( th.paijmans@wxs.nl )
Fri, 14 May 1999 02:32:16 +0200

Hello Jerry and all,

Yes, and I think we need to get a clear, cohesive picture of what the
history of free energy research in question consists of and is. There
were quite a few inventors around, except from those that became known
to us.

Thinking of wave phenomena, not only is it fascinating to note how there
appear to be waves of simultaneously done discoveries (such as the death
ray), and to see how the media treated these inventors. When publishing
on one inventor, say Keely, or Tesla, or Grindell-Mattews, in their wake
other inventors were briefly discussed as well. This is often the only
news we have at the surface of the very existence of these other
inventors.

Take for instance 1930's Dutch inventor of a fuelles motor, Johannes
Wardenier. While researching his case and collecting newspaperclippings
on him, I found a short notice that a man in Nijverdal, a small Dutch
place, claimed to have invented a fuelles motor too. Nothing more on
this man, not even a name. So, who was he? What was it that he had
invented? Was it an engine similar as Wardenier's? Or was it an entirely
new concept?

Best,

Theo Paijmans

Jerry Wayne Decker wrote:

> Hi Theo!

(snip)

> Perhaps there are various 'flavors' of electricity or
> magnetism which can explode or implode matter, though
> I think the field interference approach of phase
> conjugation is the way it really works...more wave
> phenomena than pure power.

(snip)