Re: Time Claim
perelman ( perelman@ix.netcom.com )
Wed, 30 Dec 98 14:50:31 -0700
>>Here is the excerpt from the post;
>>
>>> I am able to project my conciousness to the
>>> past. I do so by viewing the recorded footage of
>>> someone filmed in the past - it works just as well
>>> with the length of time between the filming of the
>>> reciever and the point where I broadcast the
>>> information in the past as days, weeks, months or
>>> years. When I project my conciousness into the
>>> past, I am also projecting my memories and present
>>> time thougths of events, including infomation rich
>>> events, such as reading the stock market results of
>>> the previous day. The reciever will absorb the
>>> information with the same understanding that I
>>> as the sender has it.
>>
>>Now, as I understand this claim, the sender is in the future but has
>>the information that could be used if known about in the past.
>>
>>I don't know how the sender gets the information back to the person in
>>the past but I have sent a request for clarification.
>>
>>Anyway, I thought you folks would be interested and have some ideas on
>>how to test this claim.
one big problem i see here.. since the past would be changed, no one
would remember the info being sent back.. or maybe they would.. if you
did recieve it in the past, and knowing the information, chose to NOT
send it into the future after all, would you still know it? and if you
send info like this, it doesn't have to come into being.. it just always
IS, very weird and confusing stuff surrounds time travel.. would you have
a choice as to whether or not to send the info into the future? if you
had a choice, then the info would have NO source, but if you don't have a
choice, this seems to refute the idea of free will.. who knows.. would
love to know more details.
sorry if that makes no sense.. time travel always confuses me.