>due to TR has posted some infos on his electrolysis
>research, I tried yeasterday a few experiments
>with my function generator...
>I just used 2 cables of wire sticking into a tap water
>glas and tried the electrolysis with different frequencies.
>When I used square, sine or ramp wave, just AC, there was no
>electrolysis,
All of the Meyer/Brown/etc. work was evidently done with DC only, however=
,
it was PULSED DC.
>also whatever frequencies I used from 1 to 100 Khz !
>Also voltages 1 to 10 Volts Peek to peek, no bubbles !
>The only time , when you get bubbles is, when you superimpose
>a DC voltage for at least 5 to 10 Volts DC.
>But it seems the superimposed AC is not important !
>There is also no special freqeuency, that makes it more
>efficient... at least in my small experiment !
Try a continuous 10 volt DC at 6 Amps, with a superimposed DC voltage spi=
ke
at frequencies between 9 and 15 Khz (without crossing neutral). The
amperage of the spike is unimportant. Be careful of polarity. Do not
interrupt the continuous current from source "A" when you apply the pulse=
d
HV spikes from source "B".
>It seems, normal DC has the most effect to produce gas !
>Also I could verify, that the more gas bubbles are produced
>as nearer you bring the wires ( plates) to each other !
>so, only 1 mm distance seems to be best !
Yes, as you decrease the separation distance, the voltage gradient become=
s
sharper, biasing the intervening water more intensely. Evidently, Meyer
used 1 mm as the distance in his later work.
>So I don=B4t know, if Stanley Meyer really could use special AC
>to knock of more gas out of the TAP water...
>It seems DC works best ! (at least in my samll experiment !)
There appears to be no evidence Meyer ever used any AC in his experiments.
It was Direct Current, pulsed at 9 Khz to 15 Khz, around various key
frequencies, as elucidated by Danforth and others. And, yes, TAP water =
is
correct; apparently Meyer concluded that salts absorb/dissapate the appli=
ed
voltage potential, releasing it in lieu of the water molecules; they also
may interfere with the molecular resonance he attempted to stimulate in t=
he
cavity of the water capacity as the DC pulse propagates through the
electrolyte.
Stephan, we are preparing to do some experiments here along just these
lines, and I would be greatly interested in what you do next in this aren=
a.
I anticpate that we will experiment with the DC frequencies [purportedly]
used by Meyer, as well as rectified microwave induction at the 2.4Ghz and
22Ghz peaks of the water molecule's absorption (using a common magnetron
tube).
This avenue has advantages over the self-inducing dynamo technologies, in
that the experiments are easier to construct and the results far more
readily apparent and easy to measure. What I am eager to find out, howe=
ver
(and perhaps you can do this) is what you get when you apply the high
voltage, high frequency, pulsed DC output of a Newman machine to 1mm
electrodes in a tap water bath.......