-----Original Message-----
From: Kenneth Carrigan <carrk@erols.com>
To: Keelynet <KeelyNet@DallasTexas.net>
Date: Friday, 30 October 1998 11:14
Subject: Cross postings...
>Jer,
>I know in some newsgroups, most magazines and professional periodicals
>there is requirement that cross posting does not happen. I am sure there
>are many reasons why this is a requirement.. but wondering what your
>feelings are on this list... for such cross postings?
>v/r Ken Carrigan
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dennis C. Lee <atech@ix.netcom.com>
>To: freenrg-l@eskimo.com <freenrg-l@eskimo.com> KeelyNet@DallasTexas.net
><KeelyNet@DallasTexas.net> vortex-L@eskimo.com <vortex-L@eskimo.com>
>Date: Friday, October 30, 1998 12:43 AM
>Subject: CIA? This is for you!
>
>
>>Hi;
>>
>>Some one just told me that CIA crawl all over these lists. Hey CIA people,
>>this is for you. Do you have your spots all picked out in the underground
>>cities? If not, your gonna be stuck up here on top just like the rest of
us,
>>if and when the poles tip! Even if you do have reservations, what are you
>>going to do when you come topside and see everything dead and destroyed?
It
>>ain't going to be much fun then either. Will all of your family and
friends
>>get admission to the underground city? You can deny the possibility but
that
>>won't stop the truth of the matter. You will die just like the rest of us,
>>or you will wish you were dead. Your fun and games will end up killing us
>>all. Get your butts in gear and get us ANTIGRAVITY ICECUBE
CUTTER/TRANSPORTS
>>so we can start trimming the South Pole Icecap or you will die like dogs
>>just as the rest of us will. Time is running out...
>>
>>If I die because of your stupidity, I will be so upset, I will find some
way
>>of coming back... :(
>>Dennis C. Lee
>>
>>
>>> > I'm really sick of this nonsense and
>>> > appalled at the ignorance of elementary
>>> > physics that allows it to propagate.
>>> > NOTHING will twist the rotational axis of
>>> > the earth perceptibly except collision
>>> > with another heavenly object having
>>> > enormous mass.
>>>
>>>Well, I'm afraid when you read this you're going to get even sicker.
>>>
>>>My elementary geophysics tells me that the the earth is very, very,
nearly
>>>a perfect sphere. The much talked about equatorial bulges or "oblate
>>>spheroid" shape is extremely small compared with the size of the earth.
>>>
>>>Then, my elementary physics tells me that a perfect spinning sphere has
>>>*NO* gyroscopic stability. Nada, none at all. If the earth were a perfect
>>>sphere, after a few years a gang of fleas all farting in the same
direction
>>>could tilt the earth off its axis. Of course it's not quite a perfect
>>>sphere. So how does that tiny equatorial bulge stack up against the ice
>>>packs anyway? Is much of that equatorial bulge made up of seawater? I'd
>>>really be interested in a good explanation of the physics of the
stability
>>>of a spinning *elastic* sphere (perhaps fluid filled, like a
near-spherical
>>>water balloon for instance). I'd think its centrifugal bulge would
>>>contribute to stability as expected, but is it truly the same as a rigid
>>>solid having a fixed equatorial bulge? How would such a fluid system
react,
>>>for instance, to a field which applied force to all the elements
(molecules
>>>or whatever) of the system all at once? The earth, even the solid rock,
>>>might as well be considered a near-fluid when taken altogether as a
planet.
>>>
>>>There may be other forces between the earth and sun, or even the other
>>>planets, that loom large but unknown against the simple electrogravitic
>>>(plain old gravity in straight radiated 'as in electrostatic' lines).
>>>Obviously electrostatic forces aren't small, and even gravity itself
might
>>>have some glitches to it involving large spinning masses. I know the
>>>magnetogravitic effect from such systems is thought to be vanishingly
>>>small, but that might not be the whole story. Remember "Jove rules the
>>>heavens", and there's physical evidence to back the claim (angular
momentum
>>>of the solar system). Would that be a clue?
>>>
>>>The ancients seemed terribly intersted in tracking the heavens, and
>>>evidence indicates they experienced enormous relief and celebration when
>>>observations showed that things were continuing to move in their expected
>>>paths. Why this paranoia about celectial objects reappearing in their
>>>proper places? Don't they always? Why would anyone think it could be
>>>otherwise? Maybe they knew something we don't? Maybe they or their
>>>ancestors had certain bad experiences in this regard?
>>>
>>>I'm not buying into any of this 5/5/2000 or polar shift stuff without any
>>>good evidence either. But I'm not so sure I can dismiss all of it out of
>>>hand without some good answers to some of these other questions.
>>>
>>
>>
>>Tall Ships
>>http://pw1.netcom.com/~atech/tallship.html
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
>> with the body text: leave Keelynet
>> list archives and on line subscription forms are at
>> http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> with the body text: leave Keelynet
> list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>