Cross postings...

Kenneth Carrigan ( (no email) )
Fri, 30 Oct 1998 07:15:02 -0500

Jer,
I know in some newsgroups, most magazines and professional periodicals
there is requirement that cross posting does not happen. I am sure there
are many reasons why this is a requirement.. but wondering what your
feelings are on this list... for such cross postings?
v/r Ken Carrigan

-----Original Message-----
From: Dennis C. Lee <atech@ix.netcom.com>
To: freenrg-l@eskimo.com <freenrg-l@eskimo.com> KeelyNet@DallasTexas.net
<KeelyNet@DallasTexas.net> vortex-L@eskimo.com <vortex-L@eskimo.com>
Date: Friday, October 30, 1998 12:43 AM
Subject: CIA? This is for you!

>Hi;
>
>Some one just told me that CIA crawl all over these lists. Hey CIA people,
>this is for you. Do you have your spots all picked out in the underground
>cities? If not, your gonna be stuck up here on top just like the rest of us,
>if and when the poles tip! Even if you do have reservations, what are you
>going to do when you come topside and see everything dead and destroyed? It
>ain't going to be much fun then either. Will all of your family and friends
>get admission to the underground city? You can deny the possibility but that
>won't stop the truth of the matter. You will die just like the rest of us,
>or you will wish you were dead. Your fun and games will end up killing us
>all. Get your butts in gear and get us ANTIGRAVITY ICECUBE CUTTER/TRANSPORTS
>so we can start trimming the South Pole Icecap or you will die like dogs
>just as the rest of us will. Time is running out...
>
>If I die because of your stupidity, I will be so upset, I will find some way
>of coming back... :(
>Dennis C. Lee
>
>
>> > I'm really sick of this nonsense and
>> > appalled at the ignorance of elementary
>> > physics that allows it to propagate.
>> > NOTHING will twist the rotational axis of
>> > the earth perceptibly except collision
>> > with another heavenly object having
>> > enormous mass.
>>
>>Well, I'm afraid when you read this you're going to get even sicker.
>>
>>My elementary geophysics tells me that the the earth is very, very, nearly
>>a perfect sphere. The much talked about equatorial bulges or "oblate
>>spheroid" shape is extremely small compared with the size of the earth.
>>
>>Then, my elementary physics tells me that a perfect spinning sphere has
>>*NO* gyroscopic stability. Nada, none at all. If the earth were a perfect
>>sphere, after a few years a gang of fleas all farting in the same direction
>>could tilt the earth off its axis. Of course it's not quite a perfect
>>sphere. So how does that tiny equatorial bulge stack up against the ice
>>packs anyway? Is much of that equatorial bulge made up of seawater? I'd
>>really be interested in a good explanation of the physics of the stability
>>of a spinning *elastic* sphere (perhaps fluid filled, like a near-spherical
>>water balloon for instance). I'd think its centrifugal bulge would
>>contribute to stability as expected, but is it truly the same as a rigid
>>solid having a fixed equatorial bulge? How would such a fluid system react,
>>for instance, to a field which applied force to all the elements (molecules
>>or whatever) of the system all at once? The earth, even the solid rock,
>>might as well be considered a near-fluid when taken altogether as a planet.
>>
>>There may be other forces between the earth and sun, or even the other
>>planets, that loom large but unknown against the simple electrogravitic
>>(plain old gravity in straight radiated 'as in electrostatic' lines).
>>Obviously electrostatic forces aren't small, and even gravity itself might
>>have some glitches to it involving large spinning masses. I know the
>>magnetogravitic effect from such systems is thought to be vanishingly
>>small, but that might not be the whole story. Remember "Jove rules the
>>heavens", and there's physical evidence to back the claim (angular momentum
>>of the solar system). Would that be a clue?
>>
>>The ancients seemed terribly intersted in tracking the heavens, and
>>evidence indicates they experienced enormous relief and celebration when
>>observations showed that things were continuing to move in their expected
>>paths. Why this paranoia about celectial objects reappearing in their
>>proper places? Don't they always? Why would anyone think it could be
>>otherwise? Maybe they knew something we don't? Maybe they or their
>>ancestors had certain bad experiences in this regard?
>>
>>I'm not buying into any of this 5/5/2000 or polar shift stuff without any
>>good evidence either. But I'm not so sure I can dismiss all of it out of
>>hand without some good answers to some of these other questions.
>>
>
>
>Tall Ships
>http://pw1.netcom.com/~atech/tallship.html
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> with the body text: leave Keelynet
> list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> -------------------------------------------------------------