Re: Pyramids...the intrigue continues.

Matthew Redmond ( (no email) )
Mon, 26 Oct 1998 11:15:21 +1300

Hi Bill et al,

>If the pyramid builders were masters of geometry or had powers of prophecy,
>why the pyramids with the wrong incline? A master of geometry would not
>make an inferior structure, and a master prophet would predict the right
>incline - yet there are pyramids that had the inferior knowledge
>incorporated, older than say cheops pyramid, it is as if they were learning
>as they went.

There are some that would say that the cheops pyramid is actually much older
than the others, and that the others were the kings attempt to be more like
the gods or something. There is convinsing arguement that the three major
pyramids in the giza complex were not built by those kings to whom they are
now named after, but were acquired by them when they could not be bothered
building a pyramid of their own. As to the inscription inside the pyramid
that links cheops to it, one finds an interesting problem. Who ever wrote
the inscription, be they ancient egyption or more modern, seemed to draw the
same error (something to do with cheops symbol) that was found in a book of
hirogliphs that was in print at the time of its discovery.

Another interesting suggestion made by Alford in his book was that
civilisations BEFORE the Great Pyramid of Giza was supposed to be built,
described it to pretty close detail. The part I wrote was only one of such
connections. Of course it may be incorrect, but I am a person who doesn't
care too much for "official" explanations. However I must also state that I
also don't care if I'm proven wrong, its all a learning curve.

Alford (no I don't think he his is gods gift to truth and wisdom, just an
interesting fellow with interesting ideas if any of you are wondering)
suggests something else WHICH I WILL SUMMERISE:

With assistance from research by Zicharia Sitchen who picked up on the fact
that in some ancient texts E.KUR ('House Like A Mountain') was describing
two seperate places. One was "clearly" the ziggurat (step-pyramid) E.KUR of
Enlil in Nippur. The other was situated in African lands of the Lower
World. Evidence in Akkadian text known as 'Ludlul Bel Nemeqi', which
mentions an evil god who has 'exited from the Ekur, across the horizon, in
the Lower World'. A poem to the goddess Ninharsag states that:

House bright and dark of Heaven and Earth,
for the shems put together;
E.KUR, House of the Gods with pointed-peak.

(Shems were suggested to be the flying vehicles of the gods...sounds a bit
funky without hearing why that conclusion was reached...cripes by the book,
I refuse to type that much)

ziggurats in Mesopotamia had flat tops, only great pyramid could fit
description of poined peak. Poem continues and accurately describes major
features of the pyramid in question, inside and out.

These were texts written before the pyramid was meant to have been made
(don't ask dates, my memory ain't that good, but I'll try and find them WHEN
I HAVE TIME, or can be stuffed).

This is only a suggestion, I'm not telling you that what you believe is
WRONG...only suggesting it. :)

>...Which brings me to another point, even if there are some
>super old ancient technologies, being that seemingly all information about
>them has been lost how are we to recreate them?
>If you had shown a man in the 15th century a jet from 1990 - I mean an
>upclose inspection, how is he to reproduce the device? The information he
>would have to learn just to build the materials and geometries could take a
>very long time. We learn slowly, even if I had seen a ufo flying around
the
>sky - that does not tell me what elements it is made of, how to shape them
>etc etc, I would either have to be taught those things or through trial and
>error and a LOT of time come up with them on my own.

In most cases I would agree with you, but you still have to ask where the
15th century guy with the 1990 jet engine got the idea. I understand your
point completely about being able to reproduce things from the past to prove
that they worked, but just because you cannot reproduce it does not mean
that it did not work. This is also applied to free energy devices in OUR
century. You have to start wondering that if we cannot explain something in
our own century, its going to be VERY difficult to explain that which
existed thousands of years ago.

Just because it seems imposible does not mean that it has to be imposible.
The sumerian culture, reguarded by the scientific establishment as the first
people to swap nomadic life for city life, started around 6000 years ago
with a bang. Almost overnight they had a written language, schools, I think
lawyers and other establishments as well that we have in our major cities.
They gave us the wheel, our time base of 60 seconds (their base 60, well I
think it was 60, is actually supperiour to our base 10 system when applied
to geometry. I think that some people revert to base 60 in certain
applications because of that), they worked on metals, infact they created
common alloys, etc...The Sumerians have stumped a lot of those in the
archaeological world...you just get them to say that. Not all of the
sumerian clay tablets have been read as yet, maybe they might find one that
reads "Sumerian gods created 4000 BC, all rights reseved. Any events, gods
or people depicted in this clay tablet are fictitious...etc.."

For about 200, 000 years, human beings have not altered in brain capacity or
appearance. Some anthropologists have said that if you took a baby from
that time, raised it in our own time then there would be no difference in
mental or physical development what so ever. These people were not
thick...Just not overly informed, like us.

>...You claim there are
>frequencies coming out amplified by pyramids on the grid lines, which
>frequencies?

I don't know the frequencies, but just because I don't know doesn't mean
that it didn't happen, or something like it. If I said I had a bag of salt,
could you say how many salt crystals there were in the bag...without
actually knowing the size of the bag of salt, or the proportion of salt to
the bag? Many people may then argue that the bag of salt did not exist in
the first place...not that any of this is directed at you Bill!

I also don't know everything about the engine in my car, but it still gets
me from A to B. Just have to feed the fuel tank every know and again and
check the oil and water...which reminds me....

As suggested in the previous post, there seems to be more suggestions that
pyramids seem to have some ability to tune into different frequencies of our
reality (that sounds cool). The interesting part is that observations in
our time are backed up with the same possible observations in a previous
era. Even more interesting is that if these are just stories...how on earth
did they end up coming up with such fascinating stories? There are a few
possible explanations, from the obscure to the fascinating, none of which I
can be bothered typing.

Right, breakfast time...give me something different to chew over.

Matthew.