Re: Tapping the Casimir force

Jerry Wayne Decker ( jwdatwork@yahoo.com )
Tue, 13 Oct 1998 10:04:09 -0700 (PDT)

Hi Marcelo, Ken et al!

I think we are missing something basic here...he clearly says a 6 year
old child could build it, its that simple...I know its a tease at this
point and I'm curious as any about what COULD THIS BE, that is so
simple....I've been asking every 6 year old kid I could about it and
they just give me a blank stare and run off screaming in
horror...probably cause I'm too stupid to see the elegant and obvious
simplicity..<g>...

Last night I couldn't sleep thinking about it. The 90 degree voltage
to current relationship comes to mind...and he clearly says in one
post that aether flowing into the Casimir plates can be temporarily
disrupted where I presume he is referring t high voltage impulses
though he doesn't say specifically.

The earths' magnetic field is supposed to have a vertical component,
so what if the unit, using a perpendicular tap, has a horizontal coil
with a vertical coil in the middle...the horizontal coil would be many
fine windings for high voltage...the vertical would be a few windings
for high current...and it does oscillate at 120 VAC as he said he
designed it.

So, just rambling here, but if this perpendicular component was
excited by the horizontal coil, then it follows that there would be an
induced current in the vertical coil, like a shaft inside a doughnut,
but both are comprised of coils.

We have;

1) a high voltage excitation from a neon sign transformer (12kvdc
@10ma or so) ,
2) we have 120VAC (spark gap or tuned coil?),
3) we have it simple enough for a 6 year old to build,
4) we have very basic electronics,
5) we have a kickstart system

Will try to get him to provide a proof of principle, very simple
device that will power just a flashlight bulb. This way he could lock
in himself as the inventor and seek out investors for the bigger power
units to be manufactured and sold...first to market wins bigtime when
the public is clamoring for these units.

---Marcelo Puhl wrote:
>
> >
> > In a previous post he mentioned that 15KV - 30ma (4500 Watts for 10
>
> It would be just 450 Watts ...
>
> > seconds) was required to kick start his system. Could this
indicate the
> > charging of a high voltage, high value storage capacitor somewhere
in the
> > system?
>
> The same idea as mine.
>
> Remember he stating that a TV set is a free-energy device ?
> Inside a TV you have two perpendicular fields generated by the
Horizontal
> ( 15750 Hz ) and Vertical ( 60 Hz ) deflection circuits.
>
> > You know it's interesting that ZPE hinted that the excess energy
in their
> > vortex concept was related to free energy compression around the
rotating
> > fluid. In my mind, this kind of describes the perpendicular forces
that our
> > mystery man speaks of. I wonder if any experiments have been
conducted with
> > coils immersed in collapsing high voltage electric fields, i.e. coil
> > sandwiched between charged capacitor plates. Just so happens that
I'm fooling
> > around with collapsing magnetic fields in large coils at the
moment. Might be
> > an interesting bunch of experiments - collapsing electric fields
with coil
> > loading.
>
> After visiting the web site below, I was thinking the same as you.
>
> http://www.starwon.com.au/~rayd/capflo.htm
>
> My guess is he has some HV generator exciting some type of capacitor
with
> a special coil inside. The 10 seconds initial excitation makes the
device run
> and before that the own generator starts-up.
>
> Maybe he modulates that HV source with a 60 Hz sinusoidal signal...
>
>
> > One of the statements made by the inventor of the Testatica is
that the
> > charge on the counter rotating disks must not be used directly,
otherwise the
> > effect would be destroyed. Rather this charge somehow gives rise
to a
> > condition whereby energy can be extracted from a secondary field
effect,
> > without loading the primary cause of that field.
>
> Every electric charge in movement has a perpendicular field (
magnetic ).
>
>
> > >From the description he provides, it sound like he is using
mostly common
> > components and fields to set up this 'secondary field'. The time
varying
> > primary field is not loaded, the resulting perpendicular secondary
field
> > is. Its got me thinking!
>
> As I have understood, his device generates some field that unbalance
the
> vacuum at some region on space.
>
> The "nature" or the "vacuum" ( or the universe or something like
that ) itself
> tries to compensate this unbalance generating some opposing field.
>
> This opposing field can be harnessed by the load in some clever way.
>
> To the "balancing" field created by the vacuum, this load isn't
seeing
> differently from the unbalancing field that generates this situation.
>
> So it will try to compensate this unbalanced situation FOREVER !
>
> It wouldn't matter the amount of the load ! The vacuum will try to
compensate
> every load amount you put in.
>
> Just my thoughts.
>
> ---
> Marcelo Puhl
> mark@plug-in.com.br
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> with the body text: leave keelynet
> WWW based join and leave forms and KeelyNet list archives
> are at http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>

_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com