You wrote:
----------
From: Don J. S. Adams <donadams@telusplanet.net>
To: KeelyNet@DallasTexas.net
Subject: ORGONE ENERGY - OBJECTIVE DEMONSTRATION
Date: Sunday, September 27, 1998 11:58 AM
Taken from;
http://www.orgone.org/unvsci/zzmag-orac1.htm
Reich, Wilhelm; The Cancer Biopathy; copyright 1948; Orgone Institute
Press, Inc.;=20
157 Christopher Street, New York 14, N. Y. ; (special limited edition 150=
0
copies)=20
page 106
"OBJECTIVE DEMONSTRATION OF THE ORGONE ENERGY=85=85
Demonstration of orgonotic attraction in the energy field of the orgone
accumulator:
Experiment: We bring a good magnetic needle close to an orgone accumulato=
r
of 1=20
cubic foot, in the following manner: a) close to the center of the 4 uppe=
r
edges; b)=20
close to the center of the lower edges.
Result: The magnetic north pole regularly turns toward the center of the
upper=20
edges, the magnetic south pole toward the center of the lower edges."
Which is all well and good...
I do have a problem with your following statement:
Also see the PORE New items page for a COMPLETE VINDICATION of JAMES DEME=
O
against
Carlinsky's fraudulent accusations, Demeo provides full response and PORE
backs
him up!!!
I had thought that something new had been added recently to the PORE
site. Something that I had obviously missed, fortunately nothing "new" ha=
s
been added recently. In fact, you must scroll back to Thur., 20 Mar. 1997
to find any reference to the Carlinsky/DeMeo affair. Unfortunately for
DeMeo,
there is no vindication for him even on his own site. The three section, =
43
page,
"Response" does not answer the very simple questions raised in the
Carlinsky
piece. Why is it, in this day and age, that people have to use 1,000s of
words
to answer a simple question that only requires 1 or 2 words? Pitty!
Anyway, if folks on the list are interested to see all sides of the
Carlinsky/
DeMeo conflict, then follow this link:
http://www.orgone.org/articles/ax7jdwz1.htm
This will give everyone the "full" story and the ability to form an
objective
and informed opinion on this matter.
Later...
Chuck... =20
=20