So if Professor Searl is right, you believe that the people who are
receiving great wealth from the way things are now will take faith that they
will be able to maintain their status after implementing the new technology.
They know that it will be for the good of society and will therefore work to
build from scratch. They all have access to David Hudson's monatomics so
time is no longer a concern. They will trust that hard work and fair play
will get them where they were because that's how they did it before. They
have faith that mankind has the maturity and ethics to handle the
responsibility of this powerful technology because it is understood by all
that working for the greater good is the best one can do and brings one the
most satisfaction and everyone has developed the ability and desire to do
this by instinct. Money is only a tool which the wealthy have used to do
only positive things for society. It would not occur to them to use theats
or worse to suppress this new technology because they know negative acts
stick to their life force energy and they realise it would be of no use for
the technical people will continue research regardless. You say threats are
irrelevent because you yourself would not stop working on this technology
because it's for the greater good. Your life really isn't worth living if
you can't do this research so you will risk the repercussions of ignoring
the threats and you will tell anyone who calls whatever they want to know.
Oh ya, and everyone is developed enough to be totally honest about
everything, right?
>>He has probably tried that approach. Searl is an example of society
>>suppressing its' inventors for doing too good a job. Searl's behavior is the
>>result of his having to do too much of the R&D without mainstream support
>>for too long a time. We should all shed tears for what has happened to
>>Professor Searl (we're probably next). :(
>
>Searl's behavior could be the result of a lot of things <g>. Once again,
>where is the evidence for all this R&D effort? Anything? While Searl
>continues to hide behind a veil of smoke and mirrors, he deserves ZERO
>respect, let alone tears.
What makes you think that he is hiding behind a veil of smoke and mirrors?
How can you be sure that alternative motives fitting the same facts are
impossible? How much time have you researched Professor Searl's life and
achievements? Surely you wouldn't consider making such statements without
being absolutely sure. Giving the benefit of the doubt versus absolute
condemnation calls for different levels of confidence in the facts in my
opinion.
>>Next time, offer Professor Searl 1500 pounds for a look at the magnet
>>(market rate admission price for state of the art previews in the
>>semiconductor industry I believe).
>
>What evidence do you have that Searl actually ever created a single working
>device? Have you spent 1500 pounds for a private preview of Searl's proof
>of principal? If not, then maybe it's not just 1500 pounds, maybe it's a
>trillion pounds so that nobody can afford it and he gets to keep playing
>'the game' - Come on!
Professor Searl told me that 1500 pounds is the going rate. Then again, I
honestly respect the man for his work. I keep in mind the hardship he's been
through and will give him all the slack he needs and I will always maintain
proper respect no matter what.
BTW, if I came to you with the same attitude as you have for Professor
Searl, how much would you charge me for your life's work?
>>God willing and humanity being worthy,
>>Professor Searl will find his properly respected place as being at least an
>>equal to Tesla's level of technical genius. :)
>
>You know, there's a huge difference between Tesla's and Searl's
>achievements - Tesla demonstrated over and over the creation of practical
>devices. Searl just talks about it, over and over. (somewhat inconsistantly
>over time, I might add). Should he actually produce some physical
>demonstration to back up the hot air, then perhaps I could start comparing
>him to other great achievers. Until then... what do you think?
Do you remember how Tesla ended up? After he gave us AC power, he suddenly
had completely wrong and delusional ideas and deserved to be deprived of R&D
funding for the last 40 or so years of his life right? J.P. Morgan shut
Tesla out because of the delusion that Wardencliffe would self resonate and
give power to anyone in the world who could wind a coil. Morgan was sure
this was impossible and his investments in conventional powerplants and the
electrical powerline grid had nothing to do with stopping Tesla. Morgan was
an honest and forthright person who only worked for the good of society right?
>As for us unworthy, unwashed, ungrateful peoples of the world - give me a
>break, heard it all before... utter crap! Professor of what? Ever asked
>Searl how he obtained his professorship and from where and for what (nicely
>of course)? You may be one of the faithful blind followers - not me baby,
>it takes more than an endlessly meandering hot air ballon ride to turn me
>on these days <g>. I invite you to substantiate your support for Searl with
>something more than idol worship. I assume it takes more than a tall story
>to gain your support?
Look up Herman Weyl's 'Theory of Groups & Quantum Mechanics'. Some of
Professor Searl's Magic Squares are based on Klein 4 group math. In my
opinion, Professor Searl is lightyears ahead of a personal acquaintance who
spent at least 10 years working on the same math trying to do much the same
thing. When I showed that aquaintance Professor Searl's Magic Squares, he
immediately recognized the matrix structure. He then grew somewhat resentful
and was quite negative toward Professor Searl's work. I think it has
something to do with trying your best and seeing someone on a level you
think you can never reach by your own efforts. I personally see such
situations as opportunities to learn not reasons to get upset. To see such
ability inspires me.
>With evidence, belief becomes irrelevant.
>
>Regards, Bill.
>
>P.S. Just thought I'd mention it before you propose it: I've not been paid
>off nor am I a government agent, CIA, alien cross-breed, God knows what
>else, Searl hater.
>
>I just can not see the sense in allowing the unsubstantiated claims of
>Searl (or anybody else for that matter) to continue waisting productive
>lives in a mindless, fruitless search while real progress will be made
>elsewhere. I think it should be said. How much money and effort and time
>has been invested already by the 'unworthy' people of the world FOLLOWING
>Searl's claims, with nothing to show for it? EVIDENCE BRINGS RESPECT. IMO,
>Searl should prove his case or... but he can't, can he. You know Dennis,
>this about sums it up - Searl will be remembered as one of the greatest
>frauds of the latter half of the 20th Century. IMCO, of course.
Wanna bet? 1500 pounds each for Professor Searl's preview tickets. Loser
pays all expenses. If more than a few want to come along, I'll just accept
1500 pounds each. Professor Searl would then get the other 1500 pounds each.
That's 1500 British pounds sterling of course.
Be forewarned that I am capable of defending myself and Professor Searl, so
there will be no funny business whatsoever. If necessary, my life says so.
Dennis
Tall Ships
http://pw1.netcom.com/~atech/tallship.html