----------
> From: Don J. S, Adams - <donadams@telusplanet.net>
> To: John Berry <antigrav@ihug.co.nz>
> Cc: KeelyNet@DallasTexas.net
> Subject: Re: pyramid device
> Date: Monday, September 14, 1998 3:24 PM
>
> John,
>
> thanks for your kind patience in this regard. Ok, I read the below...
was familiar with some of it...
> it is this sort of info whcih intrigues me.... this does not seem to me
to be in the domain
> of what I would refer to as witchcraft. Simmply anomalous physcial
behaviour and properties
> which appear to be repeatable and are not under the influence of human
intent to use spiritual
> entities to alter reality or to elevate oneself to godhood.
>
> May I ask some further questions? In your opinion, how many events such
as the ones
> you jave listed would be consistently repeatable and not classified as
'anecdotal'?
> On average? Maybe 50% 80%, less than 10%? Any idea? I wonder if some
of the below
> might be partially related to m-fields or l-fields?
>
> I have read some material by and/or pertaining to Abrams and Hieronymous.
Some of the
> Abrams material I found interesting as far as Hieronymous went I simply
couldnt decide
> for sure... it seemed to be partially supernatural and also seemed to be
something physical.
>
> Thank you for the examples, muchly appreciated... however it seems to me
that these
> should be explainable in accordance, generally with non-supernatural,
normal physical
> observation and anlaysisis.
>
> John Berry wrote:
> >
> > > If there is some sort of actual, non-metaphysical, non
psuedo-spiritual or non-witchcraft
> > > basis to radionics, I would VERY much like to know about it. I had
initially been quite
> > > interested in Radionics and Psychotronics until I came across the
'spiritualism' factor
> > > of it. Can you please summarize what it is I am missing here?
> >
> > There is, just most of the radionics stuff has been more spiritual,
take these things
> >
> > two snails who spend a bit of time together one then sent to a
different country if one is
> > given an electric shock the other one will react.
> >
> > Take cells (can't remember their name) from a person and connect them
to an ECG machine, they
> > will read the same ECG as the person over great distances.
> >
> > Grow two plants in darkness, but attach one to a copper plate that is
in the sun through a
> > wire, both plants will grown but only the one attached to the wire has
has green leaves.
> >
> > some old x-ray machines change in pitch when a person with cancer is
present, Abrams was able
> > to tell if the person had cancer just by the change in pitch of the
machine.
> >
> > look into what the early people did in this aera, Abrams and
Heirnoymous (obviously not the
> > correct spelling).
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> with the body text: leave keelynet
> WWW based join and leave forms and KeelyNet list archives
> are at http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> -------------------------------------------------------------