----------
> From: John Berry <antigrav@ihug.co.nz>
> To: Keelynet List <KeelyNet@DallasTexas.net>
> Subject: Re: Clem... design and equations
> Date: Monday, September 14, 1998 7:22 AM
>
PS.. NOW... WHERE IS THE OVERUNITY!!!Help me understand...
It ain't there, it is the fluid dynamics that produce the overunity, how
much thrust does a plane throw out the side to get enough upwards thrust
from the wings? Exactly, It uses well know fluid dynamic effects which are
over-unity, Is it only me who figures it's strange that they don't have
enough force to lift the craft but the thrust produced by a secondary
reaction of the initial thrust is enough?
If you need further proof then think about the difference between planes
and helicopters, helicopters have blades rather than aerofoils, they just
push the air down that's why even a small one needs to push down a LOT of
air very fast, a plane that is many time heavier and has less wig area has
less downwards flowing air than a small helicopter pointing out that a
plane is not getting it's lift in accordance with action-reaction but
rather there is more upwards force on the plane than downwards on the air.
See, we have all been in antigravity free energy craft before ;)
John Berry
Want more proof? Look at the photo's of the insides of shaubergers devices,
The pictures in calum coats book shows airofoils around the edge on an
angle for lift and rotation.
Look at all devices that are designed to push air and they are not wig
shaped, This is because the wing shape is for pushing the wing not the air.
------------------------------------------------------------- To leave this
list, email with the body text: leave keelynet WWW based join and leave
forms and KeelyNet list archives are at http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
-------------------------------------------------------------