------=_NextPart_000_0016_01BDDEF1.33A248C0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The definition of overunity in this statement is wrong. Look at the =
energy into
the plane and look at what comes out of the plane. Gasoline engines for =
example.. are not overunity.. but they do "push" your car down the raod.
The energy burned to cause the downward force on the winds.. making the
plane fly... is NOT overunity. Matter fact.. it is less effiecient than =
our
automobile in taking us to a distination. =20
I also fail to see where this "lift" produces overunity in the Clem =
engine.
I had taken into account for this thrust in the equations and the =
rotational
inertia but still... maybe there is a point where it gets more efficient =
but
not overunity. Wish Clem was still arround as he could tell us the =
basics
of what made it overunity.
v/r ken
>It ain't there, it is the fluid dynamics that produce the overunity, =
how
>much thrust does a plane throw out the side to get enough upwards =
thrust
>from the wings? Exactly, It uses well know fluid dynamic effects which =
are
>over-unity, Is it only me who figures it's strange that they don't have
>enough force to lift the craft but the thrust produced by a secondary
>reaction of the initial thrust is enough?=20
------=_NextPart_000_0016_01BDDEF1.33A248C0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">