Re: Clem... design and equations
John Berry ( antigrav@ihug.co.nz )
Sun, 13 Sep 1998 14:22:57 -0700
PS.. NOW... WHERE IS THE OVERUNITY!!!Helpme understand...
It ain't there, it is the fluid dynamics that produce the overunity,how much thrust does a plane throw out the side to get enough upwards thrustfrom the wings? Exactly, It uses well know fluid dynamic effects whichare over-unity, Is it only me who figures it's strange that they don'thave enough force to lift the craft but the thrust produced by a secondaryreaction of the initial thrust is enough?
If you need further proof then think about the difference between planesand helicopters, helicopters have blades rather than aerofoils, they justpush the air down that's why even a small one needs to push down a LOTof air very fast, a plane that is many time heavier and has less wig areahas less downwards flowing air than a small helicopter pointing out thata plane is not getting it's lift in accordance with action-reaction butrather there is more upwards force on the plane than downwards on the air.
See, we have all been in antigravity free energy craft before ;)
John Berry
Want more proof? Look at the photo's of the insides of shaubergers devices,The pictures in calum coats book shows airofoils around the edge on anangle for lift and rotation.
Look at all devices that are designed to push air and they are not wigshaped, This is because the wing shape is for pushing the wing not theair.