Ken: You are absolutely right in your observation. Joel and I took Tom
Bearden's
advice about thinking backwards when dealing with Aetheric energy. The
very
best organic dielectrics provide the best conductors for aetheric
energy. This
we learned from comments made by our dearly departed friend, LES BROWN
who said a silk cord was an excellent conductor of pyramid energy. It
seams
that plain hot rolled steel or steel wool is the best layering material
for orgone
accumulators with natural organic layers of wool, silk, wood fiber, cork
etc. as the
attraction material. Orgone energy or aetheric energy (soft electrons
in Joseph
Caters book) has a hugh affinity for water. This is the reason
polarized or charged
water is used as an accumulator in the MarkI thru MarkIII device. Read
up on
the Cloud Busters and how they are connected to a running water supply
such as
a moving stream via a flex steel conduit. Soft electrons are the
precursors to hard electrons that posses a negative charge. I think of
soft electrons as the transition state
between photons and hard electrons. They are chargeless and come from
the Aetheric
background. The 1.5 V charge placed across the MarkIII cell probably
establishes
an aetheric flow into the water and only needs to be present to get the
process started.
What do you think about this explanation????????? Norm
Ken Carrigan wrote:
> Seems to me.. that anyone spending the time and $$ to manufactor
> theseMARK I, II or III devices must have some idea that it works. I
> could notimagine someone developing the MARK I, having it fail... and
> furtherdeveloping a MARKII having it fail and then a MARK III and
> having thatfail also. Seems to me there has GOT to be something
> here... that wemight not see... but works. The latest word I heard
> was that this "energy output"is NOT coupled into the manifold... or
> carborator. It flows through the"whole" engine? That is very very
> odd.... Also note.. that Anode and cathode.. both are CRES 316 and
> only 1.5 voltsor NO voltage at all (once charged properly) is used to
> extract this "eather"energy. Seems what we are thinking is that we
> need to break the H20 downinto monotonic oxygen and monotonic
> hydrogen.. or diatomic whatever...This is NOT the case with the
> original post. The key here.. is that we must replicate this BY
> FAITH! What I mean is thatwhat we know.. about science.. IT IS NOT...
> explainable at all. At least thisis what I am getting out of this
> whole "running off the eather... What do you think.. all.. v/r Ken
> Carrigan
--------------929DCCC5FCDDBB8DEA3826E6
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Ken: You are absolutely right in your observation. Joel and I tookTom Bearden's
Ken Carrigan wrote:
Seems tome.. that anyone spending the time and $$ to manufactor theseMARKI, II or III devices must have some idea that it works. I couldnotimagine someone developingthe MARK I, having it fail... and furtherdevelopinga MARKII having it fail and then a MARK III and having thatfailalso. Seems to me there has GOT to be something here... thatwemight not see... butworks. The latest word I heard was that this "energy output"isNOT coupled into the manifold... or carborator. It flows throughthe"whole" engine? That is very very odd.... Alsonote.. that Anode and cathode.. both are CRES 316 and only 1.5 voltsorNO voltage at all (once charged properly) is used to extract this "eather"energy. Seems what we are thinking is that we need to break the H20 downintomonotonic oxygen and monotonic hydrogen.. or diatomic whatever...Thisis NOT the case with the original post. Thekey here.. is that we must replicate this BY FAITH! What I mean isthatwhat we know.. about science.. IT IS NOT...explainable at all. At least thisis what I amgetting out of this whole "running off the eather... Whatdo you think.. all.. v/r Ken Carrigan
--------------929DCCC5FCDDBB8DEA3826E6--