Re: Magnetic cement vs. Searl rollers.

Meat Truck ( (no email) )
Sat, 29 Aug 1998 07:32:20 -0500

Ferrite powder is used in the plastic industry in specialty
applications,that is how I came to become aquainted with it. Once during
the running of a tesla coil the wood pieces used to place the bars of metal
apart for the primary arc gap were placed on concrete block instead,
assuming that the insulating value would be the same. This was not possible
as the arc readily penetrated into the concrete as a short of less
resistance than the intended air gap necessary for the function of the
tesla coil. Such a short through the concrete represented a clear danger of
shorting the secondary of the power supply, thus causing a sensible person
to shut it down. But from this experience we can see that the concrete
conducted a high frequency,but not 60 hz. This led me to the wondering of a
cement mixture and the weighing of the water and cement mixture before the
lime reaction takes place. A significant amount of water weight exists in
the finished product. Now water has fantastic dielectric properties but
great inpurity problems in the liquid state. The chemistry of an idea
dictated that I decided to mix this powdered ferrite and a small additive
of amorphose silica to the cement mixture to create a superior dielectric
which indeed did exceed the dielectric qualities of water.However later on
I came to realize a much better material had already been made called
strontium ferrite in which we call a ceramic magnet. What I am calling into
question is how can this ferrite be employed to encompass different
magnetisation techniques, including that of rotating a sample during
process to alter gyromagnetic ratio. That in itself has been deemed
impossible, yet Searls magnets proclaim this by their diagonal pole
formation. In sum I would say that a system of rollers encompassing a
dielectric and magnetic material such as strontium ferrite encompassed by
aluminum rings could be a means of interacting electric and magnetic
fields to attain a rotation of rollers with an alternating current input. I
would like to thank Jerry for the historical facts concerning Searl and
Hamel which I hadnt heard of. sincerely HDN mnorris@akron.infi.net

----------
> From: Jerry Wayne Decker <jwdatwork@yahoo.com>
> To: KeelyNet@DallasTexas.net;
> Subject: Re: Magnetic cement vs. Searl rollers.
> Date: Tuesday, September 01, 1998 11:20 AM
>
>
> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> with the body text: leave keelynet
> WWW based join and leave forms and KeelyNet list archives
> are at http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> -------------------------------------------------------------