Re: Anyone has Updates on S. Meyer,Newman...?

Norman Wootan ( normw@fastlane.net )
Sun, 16 Aug 1998 11:18:46 -0500

Hi! Jerry: You are correct in that statemnet about the Clem Engine. Over
the last several years I have done somemore research comparing the Clem and
the CECAU that Terry Tharp brought up. What I have found is a fundamental
error in thinking by researchers trying to duplicate these devices. They
all miss the big picture by failing to apply some of Victor Schaubergers
technology to the puzzle. Let's have coffee some day and I'll fill in the
blanks. "So cool". Remember one thing about this device and all will
become clear in your mind. The pressure varies directly with the square of
the radius. You cannot scale down the device below a certain threshold
radius for it will not achieve the necessary pressures at RPM to break -over
and do usefull work. Think about the old story of (if you could achieve a
rotational velocity of 1000 feet/sec) becomming you own little planet
environment seperate from the earth. With your memory you will probably
"quote the story" for it is in the Keely Files. norm

Jerry W. Decker wrote:

> Hi Bill!
>
> Well, I know who to call when we get a 'working' free energy device to
> check out....<g>.....eventually I want to build a Clem engine, there are
> MANY points to it that indicate it does work as Clem said....I know it's
> not electronic but have to start somewhere. I think Norm would jump on
> an opportunity locally to build this (is that right Norm?), I know he
> does excellent machine work and has some great ideas on the various
> approaches.
>
> I think the mechanical effect can be DUPLICATED electronically using a
> Chernetskii type setup and much of it ties in with Schaubergers vortex
> schemes. That would be the electronic version of the Clem engine.
>
> Once you get mass (or electrons as in plasma) moving beyond a critical
> speed and in a specific geometry, I think it seeks expansion to produce
> all the energy you could ask for and that the device can handle.
>
> But FIRST, copy the original as closely as possible, make it work as
> claimed, then build another and let it be tested by others, then work on
> the expansions to electronic form....and above all, document and freely
> release all plans that have been proven to work when built as clearly
> described.
> --
> Jerry Wayne Decker / jdecker@keelynet.com
> http://keelynet.com / "From an Art to a Science"
> Voice : (214) 324-8741 / FAX : (214) 324-3501
> KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> with the body text: leave keelynet
> WWW based join and leave forms and KeelyNet list archives
> are at http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> -------------------------------------------------------------