Re: Overunity --- Not!

Jerry W. Decker ( (no email) )
Sun, 16 Aug 1998 01:14:34 -0500

Hi Bill et al!

I can't speak for him but on reading the posts I think he clarified it
at the bottom by stressing the difference between short duration, one
shot high power output as opposed to continuous energy sourcing as in
this quote;

> This appeared to be a profound and fundamental Tesla error. It was
> not obvious to me that he always was able to draw the distinction
> between resonant energy buildup and actual energy sourcing.

Resonant energy buildup meaning a capacitive like charging, then a quick
dump...all the nickels dumped at one time, but they do have to be
refilled. Energy sourcing as being a constant stream of nickels at
either a certain velocity/potential/voltage (assuming one a time) or
many nickels thrown out at the same time and repeated over and over for
a certain 'current'...<g>....

The most common error in f/e circuits is this very 'error' where these
high voltage/current single pulses simply can't be maintained to sustain
a load...now if they could be produced FAST enough, they would average
out for power, but to date, they haven't to my knowledge as proven by
there not being a working, self-powered, self-sustained o/u device.

--            Jerry Wayne Decker  /   jdecker@keelynet.com         http://keelynet.com   /  "From an Art to a Science"      Voice : (214) 324-8741   /   FAX :  (214) 324-3501   KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187