I just happen to personally think radioactivity is dangerous and
destructive to life as per the 'claims' of Walter Russell and others who
have done a lot of research with it.
As to arguments....when someone sells plans that they never built and
yet claims they did, then denies it after numerous people built it at
great expense, time and some personal risk, and this person makes no
apology or restitution for it, then continues with ever more extravagant
and unproven claims, I have no place for them in my investigations.
Now let such people admit the mistake publicly and apologize for
possibly deluding people, then follow up with something tangible that
others can prove indepedently without all the paranoia and name calling
of those who simply ask for independent proofs, then they are on the
right track.
This is of course my own opinion and I reserve the right to keep it,
modify it, espouse it or change it completely if circumstances warrant
it, as in a proof...so too do others have the right to develop and
espouse their own opinions.
Animosity, no, just asking for proof from those who make claims, if they
refuse to back it up, I have no time for them and ask them to just go
away so I can direct my time, funds and efforts to those who are at
least trying to be honest and up front, even to the point of saying this
is a theory, a concept, an idea, but not making claims as fact in their
seeking attention, notoriety or most commonly bucks from the gullible.
No apologies, its just the way it is...you asked, I responded.
Now Bill, you and I have met, I attended your presentation and find you
a balanced thinker, so what is your take on such matters, forget
personalities, just how long will we collectively follow those who never
provide the ability to derive independent proofs?
That's what I'm after and I'd hope others are too, if not, fine, its
their own choice, let them spend their days chasing their phantasms and
I'll chase mine...I don't KNOW that free energy is possible, but based
on planets and electrons in orbit, as well as the eternal exchanges
between celestial bodies, I would bet everything I own that it will one
day be tapped...and if I have anything to do with it, freely released
for all to use.
So, Bill, what are your thoughts on the matter?
I'd rather not see radioactivity remotely suggested as a source of free
energy on this list because it is neither novel or new as well as
destructive if exposed to flesh.
Free energy on KeelyNet includes aether/zpe/gravity taps as the main
technique, though others are on the periphery, that doesn't include
radioactivity....
-- Jerry Wayne Decker / jdecker@keelynet.com http://keelynet.com / "From an Art to a Science" Voice : (214) 324-8741 / FAX : (214) 324-3501 KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187