You wrote;
> My guess is that with correct timing, the energy spent
> to maintain the wheel spinning at 3000 rpm could be
> smaller than the energy extracted by the load.
It might be so, that gravity, inertial mass and a certain critical
speed, possibly with some resonant relationship with the mass, might at
the least increase the efficiency.
Harold Aspden did an experiment where he took a heavy spinning object,
and measured the amount of electrical energy it took to get it up to a
certain rpm. He did this many times, determining an average amount of
power that was necessary to achieve the speed.
On each of these experiments, he would bring the spinning mass to a dead
stop and start from there to determine the power curve needed to achieve
the desired rpm.
He found that when he brought the spinning mass almost to a stop, but
not quite, that it took only about 30% of the power originally needed to
get it spinning to the desired rpm.
One possible implication was that aether coupling to the mass was
partially severed and did not have time to fully recouple because the
mass never came to a full stop. Kind of like tendrils that ooze into
static masses, but are ripped away when the mass is in motion (or
vibration...<g>....important point this).
This of course ties in with Hal Puthoffs contention that inertia is
simply entrained zpe (aether). When I wrote him about it and the
tendril concept he said that was an interesting idea, using tendrils as
a visual image of what is happening.
And of course, this stems from Reynolds work with the rheological
phenomenon known as 'dilatancy'. Details are posted at;
http://www.keelynet.com/energy.htm
look for the 3 Reynolds files. This dilatant matrix is much like
quicksand which led to the 'hackysack' toy or wet sand in a balloon.
There is some peculiar bonding of certain materials that causes the
material to link together like gearteeth. When you push water into it,
the material separates.
If you've ever walked on a supposedly dry riverbed, you will note
sandbars, stand on one and rock side to side from one foot to another,
within a matter of minutes, the sand will become quicky as water oozes
up to thin the matrix.
Now, Reynolds clearly states the aether is a 'crystalline dilatant
matrix' which can be impacted by motion, whether it be vibraton or
velocity. Isn't that interesting?
So, if the aether density in a given region of space is crystallized as
part of the ambient matrix, and we stimulate that local matrix by either
motion or vibration, we alter the aether coupling tension and affect not
only matter but also energy.
Again, we are back to the Einstein UFT of inertia, electricity,
magnetism and gravity being interchangeable with aether being the
central binding force and CAUSE of all these cascaded EFFECTS.
In the same vein, DePalms reputed experiment of watches and timepieces
held near a heavy rotating mass, that changed their time, seems to
indicate an 'mass current' which affects other mass or possibly even the
aether flows into the mass directly.
And that leads to Keely's contention that 'time is gravity' so that
aether produces gravity which clocks the creation, sustention and death
of matter and which we measure as 'time'.
Such experiments certainly deserve more attention and replication. They
would be costly but pure research can't always be done on the cheap.
The variations should include different materials and possibly their
stimulation with frequency, different forces (acoustic, magnetic fields,
electrostatic or EM fields).
-- Jerry Wayne Decker / jdecker@keelynet.com http://keelynet.com / "From an Art to a Science" Voice : (214) 324-8741 / FAX : (214) 324-3501 ICQ # - 13175100 / AOL - Keelyman KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187