Re: The Gravitational Spider effect.

LARRY SULLIVAN ( polymercanada@bc.sympatico.ca )
Sun, 18 Apr 1999 11:17:07 -0700

It would seem apparent that the spider effect is all relative to the
oriantation of mass. Although we seem to want to see it as a force field
around a mass. One presumption that seems to excape many is the orbit of
the most essiental part of all matter, that being the atom. Many see the
atom as the perfectly ordered orbit of electrons around a neuculus of
protons and neutron. To me it seems apparrent that a larger spinning
mass (earth) creates a sperical vortex which creates a pull into its
centre. A larger mass will always influence the orbit of smaller mass.
So in this contense we like to call this sperical vortex gravity which
ineffect influences the the orbit of the electrons around the atom. Take
the spider effect theory and apply it as the influence of gravity to
the orbit of a atom and it becomes so easy to understand. Conteract the
effect of the earths vortex you change the orbit of the atom and
conversly the secret to antigravity.

Larry
Jerry W. Decker wrote:
>
> Hi Folks!
>
> Some comments about how the gravitational spider acts as a gravity
> deflector;
>
> http://216.60.190.54/spider/b-120dec.htm
>
> It fits so perfectly with so many other reports, from nuns and saints
> experiencing religious ecstasy, to the Lung-Gom-Pa of Tibet with reduced
> weight when in trance, to Farrow, Keely, Tesla, Schappeller,
> Leedskalnin, even Hamel and Searl. And all done with differing
> techniques that distort the wave field. Dr. Ivanov's work is simply the
> most elegant all inclusive approach I've ever had the privilege to read.
>
> The entire theory of relativity is based on one key experiment, the
> Michelson-Morley measurement of the speed of light where they found NO
> aether interaction...this led to the theory of the Lorentz
> Contraction/Transformation which hasn't been tested of course and
> finally to relativity.
>
> So the whole thing was built on a house of cards since the
> interferometer used in the M-M experiment became part of the very effect
> they were trying to measure.
>
> Silvertooth and others have since proven their is an 'aether drag' on
> the speed of light and yet, it still hasn't been incorporated back into
> physics. I'll see the gravity belt I fly with in my dreams as a reality
> yet. NASA spending $600,000 on the Tampere diamagnetic effect, what a
> waste....
>
> Imagine two or three large piezo emitters projecting a wave front either
> in front of a mass to create a 'hole in the background wavefront' so
> that the pressure of the aether/zpe will PUSH the mass INTO that reduced
> pressure region, that solves THRUST....direct another set of emitters
> ABOVE the mass, deflect the incoming aether/zpe so that a void is
> created and the mass FALLS UP into the void....just like a kid on a
> wagon pulled by a horse...hold a carrot in front of the horse and he
> will follow the carrot...just so with this...hold the void in front of
> the mass and it WILL FOLLOW BY FALLING IN THAT DIRECTION the void.
>
> Keely stated that he had created an artificial neutral center which he
> could move at will within the mass to cause the natural neutral center
> to follow.
>
> ..From; http://216.60.190.54/keely/neutral1.txt
>
> "In the conception of any machine here-to-fore constructed, the medium
> for INDUCING a Neutral Centre HAS NEVER BEEN FOUND.
>
> If it had, the difficulties of perpetual motion seekers would have
> ended, and this problem would have become an established and operating
> fact.
>
> It would only require an INTRODUCTORY IMPULSE of a few pounds, on such a
> device, TO CAUSE IT TO RUN FOR CENTURIES.
>
> In the conception of my VIBRATORY ENGINE, I did NOT SEEK TO ATTAIN
> PERPETUAL MOTION; but A CIRCUIT IS FORMED THAT ACTUALLY HAS A NEUTRAL
> CENTRE, which is in a condition to be vivified by my VIBRATORY ETHER,
> and while under operation, by said substance, is really A MACHINE THAT
> IS VIRTUALLY INDEPENDENT OF THE MASS (OR GLOBE), and it is the wonderful
> velocity of the vibratory circuit which makes it so."
>
> Velocity of the vibratory circuit....of course he means the flow of
> aether through the directed path of his machine, not an electronic
> circuit as we think. The globe motor therefore was a kind of resistor
> to the flow of aether, where the yielding of aether to the resistance
> induced rotation and tremenouse torque and rpms. Since all his
> researches revolved around sound, it was purely INTERFERENCE, whether
> constructive or destrutive which allowed him to tap into natural forces
> such as aether.
>
> That is why I am so taken with Ivanovs work, because it shows how Keely
> and many others could have all produced similar effects using different
> techniques but all, in actuality, due to an accidental formation of
> interference patterns by stimulated geometric arrangements.
>
> Keely continues;
> "Still, with all its perfection, it requires to be fed with the
> VIBRATORY ETHER to make it AN INDEPENDENT MOTOR....."
>
> "The man who can, even in a simple way, appreciate this vast problem has
> been endowed by the Creator with one of the greatest gifts which He can
> bestow upon a mortal."
>
> "It is well known that ALL STRUCTURES REQUIRE A FOUNDATION IN STRENGTH
> according to the weight of the mass they have to carry, but the
> foundations of the Universe REST ON A VACUOUS POINT FAR MORE MINUTE THAN
> A MOLECULE."
>
> And that is the neutral center....just so.
> --
> Jerry Wayne Decker / jdecker@keelynet.com
> http://keelynet.com / "From an Art to a Science"
> Voice : (214) 324-8741 / FAX : (214) 324-3501
> KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> with the body text: leave Keelynet
> list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> -------------------------------------------------------------