Re: All Vortex phenomena are Clockwise?

John Berry ( antigrav@ihug.co.nz )
Sun, 11 Apr 1999 17:39:11 +1200

Sorry for the multiple errors in this post didn't check it. (e.g. clock wire as
opposed to clock wise)

John Berry wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Your following message has been delivered to the 302 members of
> the list KeelyNet@DallasTexas.net at 00:17:55 on 11 Apr 1999.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I remember reading that a clock wire swastika (opposite to that used by
> nazi's) was said to have a luck charm effect (an asian thing), I guess this
> causes your energies to be sucked away from you and into the world so your
> thoughts of good luck turn into real good luck, reminds me of the note in
> the pyramid thing, well the other thing is that putting a note in the fire
> had the same effect, they are males expansive energies.
> hot
> male
> red
> clockwise etc...
>
> and putting a note in a freezer stopped the thing from happening
>
> cold is female energy
> blue
> counter clock wise.
>
> The cross parts of a swastika is clearly the same as a caduceus coil and
> other crosses, cross geometry's (related to the recent post jerry made on
> angles).
>
> Just as well the nazi's used a CCW swastika, must have been their undoing ;)
>
> so male if you want the thing to happen, female if you don't. (female if
> your sick, but if your not growing, or have a wound that is not healing (and
> not infected) then males expansive growing energies)
>
> now how to transmit balanced energies?
>
> guess you need a fine balance between the two forces, makes me think of the
> delicate balancing of rock stacking, maybe it is more than just pretty to
> look at.
>
> John Berry
>
> "Jerry W. Decker" wrote:
>
> > Hi Folks!
> >
> > ...Frank Hartman sent in the following information regarding the true
> > spin direction of all vortexes;
> >
> > Sensory Illusion - There are many illusions that are commonly
> > recognized.
> >
> > Objects close up appear bigger than objects in a distance.
> > Water appears to move as waves roll to shore.
> > Railroad tracks come together in the distance.
> >
> > 2. The greater the number of Senses affected, the greater the strength
> > of this illusion. Multiple sensory illusion at a very deep level
> > overrides logic and reason and causes reflexive reaction: i.e.
> >
> > When sitting at a stop light and the cars on each side begin to move,
> > subconscious response will cause the foot to push hard on the brake. The
> > same in a car wash. Logically and consciously we know we are not moving
> > but multi-sensory illusion will still create a reflex response.
> >
> > Rides at theme park which clearly never move or travel anywhere but use
> > visual, tactile and auditory stimuli will create an illusion so strong
> > it will override logic and reason and can cause severe physical
> > reactions of vertigo and nausea just as if the ride was moving.
> >
> > In Disney theme park "Honey I shrunk the kids" 3 D video, it is
> > virtually impossible not to lift your feet when the visual and tactile
> > sensory illusion of mice on the floor is created.
> >
> > When emerging from a strong dream or nightmare state, every body
> > sensation and response just after the dream is identical to the response
> > in reality. (pounding heartbeat, fast breathing, high anxiety, etc.)
> >
> > These are the illusions we recognize and accept but others exist that
> > are not recognized. It would seem that there are a number of illusions
> > in science which are not recognized.
> >
> > Among these in the area of vorticity is vortex rotation.
> >
> > All vortexes in the universe rotate from west to east. Anti clockwise.
> >
> > Storms in the southern hemisphere do not rotate in the opposite
> > direction from the northern hemisphere. It is only an illusion caused by
> > perspective of looking down into the vortex from the other end.
> >
> > If you take a slinky and look into from one end and then rotate it so
> > you are looking in the other end, the direction of rotation seems to
> > reverse but it is always turning the same way.
> >
> > Neptune, Jupiter and its moons and Uranus moons apparent retrogression
> > is part of the same illusion.
> >
> > In nature there are only two small exception in flowing water and air:
> >
> > 1. a primary strong vortex may create secondary clockwise spirals
> >
> > 2. all water flowing around obstruction create anti clockwise rotation
> > but an unobstructed flow of a stream into a still pool will create
> > initial clockwise rotation.
> >
> > 3. All living systems are created in Nature with anti clockwise wise
> > rotation. i.e. all amino acids, proteins, natural sugars, etc. All
> > planetary systems appear do the same.
> >
> > Anti-clockwise rotation concentrates. nature is always moving toward
> > equalized potential. Hurricanes are low pressure systems that Nature is
> > bringing back to balance by counterclockwise rotation concentrating
> > mass and pressure into a lower pressure zone from a higher pressure
> > zone.
> >
> > In the past there have been a number of posts to Keely which have not
> > recognized this as an illusion. maybe we can clear this up once and put
> > it to bed.
> >
> > Kindest regards
> > ...frank hartman - suemc@gate.net
> > =======================
> > Hi Frank!
> >
> > Now I'm not too sure about this....could you provide the URL that came
> > ...from? This is something that I wrote about many years ago, this
> > confusion of clockwise and counter clockwise with regard to spin
> > direction.
> >
> > ...From what I can tell, it is TOTALLY A MATTER OF PERSPECTIVE.
> >
> > What got me going on it, was the work of Davis and Rawls with magnetic
> > fields of the Earth.
> >
> > They claim that magnetic poles have completely opposite effects,
> > including spin direction.
> >
> > The normal understanding is that magnetic field lines flow OUT of the
> > South pole, away from the earth, then back IN to the North pole.
> >
> > This would provide for monopolar effects as polar opposites. As I recall
> > the spin direction according to them is CCW for North pole and CW for
> > South pole as in the file;
> >
> > http://www.keelynet.com/biology/biomag2.htm
> >
> > "Specifically, North Pole energies cause mass to contract and condense,
> > rotating in a CCW direction, while South Pole energies cause mass to
> > expand and dissipate, rotating in a CW direction.
> >
> > Also, North Pole energies have alkaline properties while South Pole
> > energy is acid. North pole energies tend to collect fluids while South
> > Pole energies dissipate fluids.
> >
> > North pole energy is referred to as negative because it reduces or
> > attracts, while South pole energy is referred to as positive because it
> > expands and dissipates.
> >
> > Since magnetic monopole magnets are not available at just any Wal-Mart
> > store, they chose to use the longest possible bar or cylinder magnets
> > they could acquire which would allow for the greatest separation of the
> > two opposite energies.
> >
> > It was found that use of a North Pole would provide an energetic
> > environment which would cause cancer cells to contract and die out.
> > This energetic environment also has other healthy applications as
> > detailed in their many books."
> >
> > Note: read the file to learn how to identify the true poles.
> > ===========================
> > This does NOT EXPLAIN WHAT HAPPENS AT THE EQUATOR. I have heard from
> > travellers in that part of the world who claim electrical equipment,
> > even jeep, auto and truck electrical systems often fail or are
> > unreliable on the equator.
> >
> > So, if they are correct, saying the North pole has a CCW spin and South
> > pole has a CW spin, then what is their perspective? Everything
> > indicates it was from the equator!!!!!
> >
> > Look Northward from the equator and it is moving TOWARD you in a CCW
> > spin.
> >
> > Look Southward from the equator and it is moving AWAY from you in a CW
> > spin.
> >
> > If your point of view is from the North pole, you will see that the spin
> > moves through the earth with NO CHANGE in spin direction.
> >
> > If your point of view is from the South pole, it would like like one
> > spring moving completely through the earth, though I think it would
> > converge at the equator, looking like an hourglass shaped spring as it
> > does seem to FOCUS at the equator.
> >
> > However, Davis/Rawls claim that the BLOCH WALL which occurs at the
> > center of magnetic fields causes the North pole inflowing energy to flip
> > by 180 degrees, becoming South pole energy, expanding to exit the
> > planet, thus what WAS CCW is NOW CW due solely to the Bloch Wall flip.
> >
> > This is not the case with a long coil of wire with a DC current moving
> > through it...there IS NO FLIP as measured with a compass held close to
> > the powered coil.
> >
> > You see the same kind of confusion in much of the writing of Walter
> > Russell.
> >
> > At any rate...I agree that there is ONE spin direction...the question
> > becomes IS IT COMING AT YOU??? or IS IT MOVING AWAY FROM YOU???
> >
> > One way imparts energy, the other sucks it out.
> >
> > This is also claimed to have been proven by Flanagan using two moebius
> > antennas. One has a LEFT hand spin which is claimed to suck energy FROM
> > the surroundings and inject it into the target. One has a RIGHT hand
> > spin and is claimed to suck energy FROM THE SUBJECT and dissipate it
> > into the surrounding environment.
> >
> > The story is that Flanagan wrote that he hooked up a small, very weak
> > oscillator to a LEFT HAND MOEBIUS and aimed it outwards from his
> > workshop towards where people were working in his building. Within
> > minutes, people started complaining of being tired and drained. He
> > assured them they would feel better momentarily.
> >
> > He shut down the oscillator, removed the LEFT hand moebius and attached
> > the RIGHT hand moebius. Turned the oscillator back on and everyone was
> > now feeling right with the world and quite energetic.
> >
> > Two terms come into play here - a balanced dual spin property referred
> > to as RACEMIC;
> >
> > Date: 1892: of, relating to, or constituting a compound or mixture that
> > is composed of equal amounts of dextrorotatory (right hand rotation) and
> > levorotatory (left hand rotation) forms of the same compound and is not
> > optically active
> >
> > (isn't that intriguing, when they are balanced, (can you say scalar?)
> > they aren't 'optically active')
> >
> > and CHIRALITY;
> >
> > Date: 1894: of or relating to a molecule that is not superimposable on
> > its mirror image
> >
> > I guess my point is that you should be able create an essentially
> > monopolar field using the right geometry.
> >
> > A crude effect would be using a circularly polarized antenna where you
> > could only PROJECT energy and depending on your intent, your spin
> > direction would be oriented to match the 'spin' of your subject to allow
> > absorption of this additional energy.
> >
> > Would make for some great experiments with plants or yeast or breeding
> > ...flies or such....a solenoidal coil directed so that the suction side
> > of the North polarity would be directed to the living mass and see what
> > happens. Mabye have identical matter on the South polarity and see what
> > happens, do they fluorish, die or is there no effect.
> >
> > It wouldn't do to experiment with pulsing the current as this is
> > specifically to determine monopolar flow effects, not bidirectional
> > effects..
> > --
> > Jerry Wayne Decker / jdecker@keelynet.com
> > http://keelynet.com / "From an Art to a Science"
> > Voice : (214) 324-8741 / FAX : (214) 324-3501
> > KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> > with the body text: leave Keelynet
> > list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> > http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> with the body text: leave Keelynet
> list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> -------------------------------------------------------------