Two other things I will now share, I got a resistor (totally separate
from above experiment) and put the meter on it's highest ohm reading
setting and read the value of the pot which was negative, at first I
thought this to be an error but shorting the leads gave a positive
resistance but at some values on that POT I got a readings at least in
there 20 somethings negative resistance when the short gave a zero or
positive resistance of not above 2 (what ever scale my meter was on)
when the POT was at different values the resistance went positive but at
a certain range it went negative and I can find no other explanation, I
believe the effect was real though small.
Another note is that the energy from *"earth batteries" was increased by
carbon rheostats (there are patents on this), the value depended on many
factors including time of year, this increased efficiency if they were
correctly connected, this is clearly radionic in nature, of course free
energy inventors often claim specific frequencies and they even rub caps
to tell when they are at the right value which are obviously acting as
rubbing plates.
Well just decided I would share my thoughts, and of course electrolytic
caps put out a constant energy but don't seem to degrade (and so do very
large normal caps)
If only it was the one milliwatt challenge!
John Berry
* Earth batteries were plates of copper and zinc buried many miles apart
attached by iron cable for telegraph, they put out enough energy to
sometimes eliminate the other batteries yet did not corrode at any kind
of speed expected.