Re: Electrostatic Power Generating System
Marinus Berghuis ( renkahu@ihug.co.nz )
Sun, 03 Mar 2002 15:38:33 +1300
At 15:05 13/03/99 -0800, you wrote:
>Just a few notes. Nickel does not become reactive until about 600 C.
>Once initiated it becomes self sustaining.
> Brown sediment? They don't say use only distilled water in batteries
>for nothing. Would sodium bicarb perhaps be workable?
>
>Larry Marinus Berghuis wrote:
>>
>A little more clarification re the water use.
I have used creek water from all sorts of creeks, big river water, bush
water, rain water, boiled water, distilled water. (I have a big still where
I make my tipple in)
but have refrained from using additives todate.
Thanks for the nickel information.
Question for Ken Carrigan.
Did you down load the Sullos file? I have had only one response from him
but will try once again to find out how much current his high voltage
generator takes. When I re read some of Bearden's file, I get the
impression that this Sullos guy has something to take note of. He states
that when a voltage limit has been reached, a magnetic field will work in
opposition to the normal Lenz law rule and should be exploytable for anti
gravity effects.
I believe Hamel's experiments work the other way. By spinning magnets over
certain limits, high voltages are obtainable which of course can be stepped
down to usable levels. So these two experimenters work on the same thing
but from opposite camps.
One of the main ingredients of the Testika Static electricity reducer are
the horse shoe magnets wound in various ways but with 4 sandwiches of
aluminium
plexiglass and copperplates.
I think that these are in the position they are in to maintain the motive
power once set in motion as each sandwich is maintaining a voltage potential
which would react with the remaining static charge on the rim of the discs
after passing the collectors.The reducing from high voltage potential to
lower higher current potential is accomplished by the coils inside the
Leyden jars.
I have found various descriptions of the workings in a schematic form but
no one so far has produced and exact formula as this is obviously a guarded
secret with as many guesses as people experimenting.
I was rather intrigued by the pre conference statement that Mr.Hamel has
the answer to mechanically minded people to be self sufficient in energy
and am waiting with baited braith the outcome as I am desperately in need
of free energy in the location where I live.
Another matter altogether.
I hear all sorts of alarming messages regarding y2K. Even our Government is
circulating warning messages so tried my computer.
Put the clock on 31st of December 1999 23.59p.m.and hey presto it rolled over
nicely stating 1st of January year 2000
So tried some other functions which also worked by rolling over to
2001,2002 and 2003 etc.
Mycomputer is a 486 120 megahertz etc.
Does this mean it is compliant?
Greetings from down under.
Going slowly crazy,my spacebar giving up the ghost and have to correct
every sentence.
Ren