Electromagnetic generator/ground antennas
LARRY SULLIVAN ( polymercanada@bc.sympatico.ca )
Sat, 13 Mar 1999 17:44:00 -0800
>=20
> http://borderlands.com/newstuff/research/ground-ant.htm
>=20
> An interesting comment on the increased sin wave strength from =
ground
> antennas(collectors)
>=20
> Larry
>=20
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Experiment: Ground Antennas [Image]
>=20
> By Gerry Vassilatos & Michael Theroux
>=20
> THE EXPERIMENTS WHICH WILL HERE BE DESCRIBED ARE NOT IN
> THEMSELVES DANGEROUS. THERE IS DANGER FOR THOSE WHO DO NOT
> TAKE ORDINARY PRECAUTIONS WHEN USING AC POWERED RADIOS.
>=20
> ANY WORK PERFORMED ON SUCH RADIOS DEMANDS DISCONNECTION FROM THE
> MAINS DURING ALL PREPARATORY PHASES OF THESE EXPERIMENTS. NEVER
> CONNECT WIRES TO ANY RADIO WHICH HAS BEEN LEFT OPERATING. HAZARDOUS
> SHOCK CAN RESULT. DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES PERFORM THESE
> EXPERIMENTS DURING A STORM! GROUND ANTENNAS ARE DIRECT CONNECTIONS TO
> EARTH. WE SUGGEST YOU TAKE PRECAUTION BY OBTAINING AN INEXPENSIVE
> LIGHTNING ARRESTER FROM LOCAL RADIO MARKETS.
>=20
> THE historical essay on Ground Antennas is only a preliminary
> bibliography, a foundation upon which to place our empirical
> confidence. It is through the agency of just such articles and
> patents that an archane world model finds its most complete
> explanation. The inherent wonder of signals detected by
> ground-connected shortwave receivers is their ability to receive
> signals with greater strength and clarity than conventional aerials,
> and to reveal the bioactivity of subterranean propagation. Beyond
> their use as audio "capture systems", such shortwave receivers
> display other more intriguing characteristics which lead our
> attentions up toward a technology of the sublime. With the shortwave
> receiver as a radionic tuning instrument, an interface which captures
> and converts geomantic dynamics into audio signals, we have made
> several astounding observations.
>=20
> Recall that when shortwave radio receivers were employed as peculiar
> detectors of geomantic energy, additional unexpected phenomena began
> to flood the relevant literature. Close inspection reveals that both
> "ground radio" and "ground antennas" are the components of Radionic
> phenomena, and are completely dependent on Radionic principles for
> their astounding and otherwise anomalous performance. Explorations of
> the interactions between radiosignals and geomantic energies require
> very simple equipment. Geomantic energy is biodynamic, and actively
> modifies and augments radiosignal carriers. This presentation will
> focus primarily on the more qualitative aspects obtained through the
> use of ground-buried aerial designs, although it will certainly follow
> that stringent quantitative measurements will be both secured and
> reported.
>=20
> This basic preliminary experiment with the simplest ground aerial
> teaches the biological growth characteristic of signals received
> through the ground. Indeed, the implementation of a simple ground pipe
> in place of an aerial, also converts the shortwave receiver into a
> diagnostic tool. We may, by merely sweeping the receiver dial, probe
> and "view" the biodynamic conditions prevalent in the ground. Despite
> the great variety of ground aerial designs, we observe a consistent
> signature of the ground densified biodynamic energies.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> EXPERIMENT WITH A COPPER GROUND PIPE (G. Vassilatos)
>=20
> Please observe the precautionary notes placed at the beginning of this
> article! When you have, try a simple experiment for yourself. Obtain a
> short (2 feet) section of copper pipe from any hardware store. Make a
> small cut into the top of this with a hacksaw. The cut is made so that
> you may twist into it a secure wire lead. Although the placement of
> the pipe is most important for many radionic experiments, you will not
> be required to select the most potent spot. While there are those
> whose qualitative sensitivities permit such a direct location of
> highly "active" ground locations, there are more quantitative methods
> to assist in this necessary survey. If you wish to conduct your
> experiments outdoors, you will need appropriate portable radios and
> the like. In this case, you will more readily discover the phenomena
> which we will mention. Plants are great indicators for determining the
> right placement of ground antennas and earth batteries =97 as they are
> also great indicators of subsurface mineral content.
>=20
> If you wish to establish the very best point, find a place where dark
> green vegetation thrives. Empirical explorations will serve you best.
> While desertified plots of earth generally reveal the absence of
> easily accessible ground currents, you will discover an amazing
> phenomenon in such a location. Wait until the ground is soft. I
> usually wait until after a good rainfall before driving my
> experimental antennas down, having selected a very verdant garden
> strip just below my office window. You will need an available window,
> if you wish to maintain the arrangement with the radio indoors. Wire
> will be run from your receiver to the ground antenna, so it is
> imperative that your window coincide with the ground point which you
> have selected.
>=20
> Wear gloves when performing this portion of the experiment. Using a
> small sledge, carefully drive in a 2 foot long copper pipe. The pipe
> you choose can be much longer according to your local needs. I left a
> 4 inch section above ground for the hookup. Obtain a sufficient length
> of coaxial cable (RG 58 works fine) to establish a lead between the
> pipe and your radio receiver. If long enough, an old straight electric
> guitar cable will do. I clipped off both phono plugs and used the
> center conductor for my experiments. Neatly trim away the outer
> shielding with rubber tape. First connect the center lead directly to
> the "aerial" terminal of your receiver. If your receiver has only an
> external antenna, connect the ground lead directly to this antenna.
> Now carefully drop this wire from your window to the ground antenna.
> Close the window to hold the line, and go outside to establish your
> connection.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> OBSERVATION 1
>=20
> The line will instantly be flooded with ground currents, very high
> potentials which will not cause "shock", but which may over-excite
> your system. Take care not to handle these lines for too long a time
> without rubber gloves. The line from ground may appear "dead" to all
> appearance, but it is a source of powerful vitalistic effects which
> can cause fatigue and other congestive sensations. Once attached to
> your receiver, leave the wire alone. The ground currents may be
> applied to any kind of receiver. I successfully received television
> signals with a ground antenna, obtaining surprisingly clarified
> signals on most of the shorter wave channels (7 through UHF) without
> any other aerial. Ground antennas are very useful for those who live
> in mountain-bound locations, where television reception is distorted
> or even absent.
>=20
> I first connected the lead wire from ground to a small shortwave
> receiver, a Hammerlund 38-S, which was acquired at an amateur radio
> sale. The simple ground pipe brought in a surprising wealth of very
> strong signals. When you first hear these signals for yourself, you
> must take time to realize that the original radio theory "prohibited"
> all such possibility. Straight connection to ground was theoretically
> considered an impossibility, being the "neutralization" of signals
> received through the aerial wave route. It was precisely because of
> these observations that the original theoretical model, which spoke
> only of "radio skywaves", was first modified to accommodate the
> obvious ground wave activity. Once dogmatically fixed, radio theory
> required continual "a posteriori" modifications: modifications from
> the empirical world. Now you will begin to observe and appreciate
> numerous empirical effects which are yet considered "impossible". With
> your small system, you will literally peer into the subterranean
> world, where bioactivities are in persistent dynamic exchange.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> OBSERVATION 2
>=20
> The first such effect has to do with the "response" characteristics of
> ground currents. Tune to one of your stronger stations. While
> listening, momentarily disconnect the ground wire. Notice the sudden
> drop in volume and signal integrity. How long did this volume
> diminution occur? Now reconnect the lead, while paying close attention
> to the sound quality over time. How long did the signal require in
> order to reach its original volume? I have repeatedly observed that
> the disconnection volume drop is rather instantaneous. But the
> reconnection volume requires a much longer time, some 40 seconds in
> certain cases. The slow restoration effect sometimes occurs in a
> discontinuous fashion, first rising slowly (20 seconds), and then very
> suddenly (3 seconds). The volume increase in this manner can be both
> unexpected and surprising, often reaching volume levels which actually
> exceed their original states.
>=20
> You will find that every local change in proximity to the circuitry of
> your simple system will provoke the "restoration response". Signals
> seem to lag each change which has been applied to the system. The
> adjustment of the ground antenna will provoke the response, a slow
> rise in volume occurring perhaps in 35 seconds after an adjustment has
> been made. As with the response of living things, the ground receiving
> receiver behaves as a quasi-biological entity; a poignant and
> astonishing glimpse of Biodynamic behavior. Bio-organisms do not
> behave in the manner of digital switches. But once signals have been
> impacted by any electrical expression, ground received signals will
> execute an exaggerated restoration. This exaggerated response will be
> observed with every local electrical disturbance. The mere activation
> of an appliance or lamp will evoke the rapid diminution of any signal.
> But the restoration phase can gradually increase in volume until it
> overwhelms the listener, reaching excessive volumes. This response is
> more than "withdrawal and restoration". Its effects can persist long
> after the impact has occurred. Proper placement of the ground antenna
> absolutely determines this magnification effect, an observation made
> throughout the last Century.
>=20
> Provided the ground "antenna" has been accurately placed in an "active
> spot", the effect most notably occurs with any electrostatic
> discharge. The first response is for the signal to "shrink", or
> "withdraw". The ground signal gradually reemerges in strength, but
> continues expanding beyond its normal volume, "flaring" into distorted
> brilliance before settling down to its normal volume. This
> amplification effect is not to be confused with the commonly observed
> shortwave "fading" effect, and is the direct result of disturbances
> which have occurred in proximity to the system. These brilliant audio
> "flares" can persist for upwards of ten seconds after the disturbance
> has passed, followed by a very gradual decrease in volume to the
> original signal strength. The flaring response was artificially
> arranged and used in a great number of post-Victorian devices.
>=20
> This biodynamic response was used to magnify vital energies, and was
> evoked by Turn of the Century systems through the use of pulsed
> electrical disturbances. The highly intensified quasi-electrical
> potentials, subsequently obtained, were used to cure illness and light
> lamps. In other appropriate instruments, such resultant currents were
> used to fulfill a variety of other experimental functions. With the
> requisite proper location of the ground terminal, the effect was
> deliberately applied to the ground currents themselves (Tesla) and to
> human patients (Abrams). While the results were often spectacular to
> the senses, the latent effects were seldom addressed.
>=20
> We concur with those select Radionists, who condemned the
> electrostimulation of ground and vital currents as an inferior
> methodology. Such methods may provide intriguing solutions to the need
> for electrical power, but as that is a degenerate technology in its
> own right, we have sought other means by which to fulfill the
> utilitarian needs of humanity. The electrostimulation methods provoke
> natural rage on an unappreciated scale, with effects not recognized by
> all but the most astute observers. It is a means of which we also
> highly disapprove. There are indeed better and more naturally
> acceptable means by which to evoke the growth and magnification
> response in ground currents. One may romance the favors of Nature
> without the methods which deliberately enrage her furious wrath.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> OBSERVATION 3
>=20
> There are other effects one notices, especially when tuning faint
> stations with ground antennas. It seems that tuned stations actually
> become stronger in the act of being heard, a bizarre effect requiring
> fine order readjustments. Indeed, continued reception of faint
> stations evidence definite auto-magnification effects. Obtained only
> through the use of analogue (variable capacity) tuning systems, the
> tuning process seemingly magnifies the strength of any faintly
> received signal. One may thus begin with a signal "granule", and end
> with a booming volume. Such entuned signal growth only occurs with
> continued attentive reception, a remarkable phenomenon in which
> receivers literally draw and automagnify signals on demand of the
> listening site. This strange connective "supply-response" function
> does not occur without human agency however. In absence of the human
> "recipient", no such amplification occurs, a curiosity which will find
> numerous skeptics and critics. But try the experiment for yourself.
>=20
> Tune a weak station and leave the room. The signal fades away. Walk in
> again and quickly tune the signal. Walk away once more. The signal
> fades. Once more, tune the signal and walk back from the receiver.
> With very minor waverings, the signal strength will remain
> unchanged...until you walk directly before the receiver. Stay this
> time. Tune the signal and wait. You will literally hear the signal
> gradually rising in volume. The faint signal will gradually, almost
> perceptibly, grow in strength for you as you remain in the room. Now
> tune the signal carefully, rocking the dial to the left or right of
> center. Each readjustment raises the signal strength, until the volume
> is strong. Periodic minor adjustments will reveal a remarkable volume
> magnification, one which can reach enormous and fixed volume levels.
> This observation takes time and patience. With such patience, one can
> thus literally obtain a "signal bonfire" from a "signal spark". We
> have observed a signal increase while attentions are being focussed on
> the signal, with a subsequent complete fade back to faintness after
> the recipients have been removed.
>=20
> Why can you tune such a weak station, periodically making "fine
> adjustments", and obtain a signal magnification? Tuning a weak signal
> through a ground antenna, and then observing the manner in which that
> signal actually "grows" in strength for a human recipient, is a
> demonstration of radionic significance. The same has been observed
> when radionic currents are selected through tuning instruments, and
> allowed to stimulate a biomonitored plant. The results are always the
> same, plant responses indicating the gradual increase of radionic
> current strength. Unlike aerial currents, ground signals are more
> intensely radionic in nature. They actively seek to infuse appropriate
> bio-organismic "capacities". Ground currents enter the receiver and
> are there entuned. The receiving circuit projects an infusive and
> thready auric radiance which floods the listening space until its
> natural saturation has been reached.
>=20
> Those who are in the listening space add an additional absorptivity, a
> capacity to allow a continued projection of auric emanations. This
> continued projectivity into proximal recipients produces several
> characteristic attributes. Recipients who possess an innate desire, an
> emotional response for the signals, produce sudden surges in the
> reception strength. When attention is strongly focussed on some faint
> signal, then it will grow. The ground emerging signals will therefore
> intensify for you and those with you in a room, pouring into the
> listening space and being thus articulated among human "capacities".
> As radio signals are loaded with the articulation of human attention,
> the signal will grow more rapidly. It has recently been observed that
> the very same signal, when later left unattended, will fade back into
> the crashing background. Desirous attempts made to relocate and raise
> the same signal are not unsuccessful. The absence of appropriate
> numbers in the human recipients will modify the rapidity of signal
> growth. The humanly guided tuning process which engages such signals
> actually entunes the recipients in a radionic manner.
>=20
> The refinement and entunement of such signals are very obviously a
> radionic phenomenon of the deepest significance. Entuned magnification
> effects are therefore radionic entunement effects, the magnification
> of human articulations by human recipients. Neither electrical nor
> radio currents possess the articulate nature capable of exhibiting
> such a detailed biodynamic function. We have previously demonstrated
> this phenomenon with biomonitored plants, an effect which
> experimenters may easily reproduce. The implications of this strange
> effect are enormous for the theoretician. They compel the examination
> of every notion of radiosignal causality. The only researcher who has
> treated this effect is Eric Dollard, whose excellent work describes
> "energy reciprocation" between Tesla impulse transmitters and
> receivers.
>=20
> The fact that signals may be drawn from ground on human demand, and
> automagnified by human presence, should provoke heated debate. How can
> one explain the veritable control of a distant transmitter by a small
> receiver? In a biodynamic sense, we are not required to address
> distant transmitters, since ground currents automagnify with
> regularity. The additional energy which feeds radionically entuned and
> capacity-demanded ground signals is sourced within the great
> subterranean depths.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> OBSERVATION 4
>=20
> You will notice that, soon after you have first introduced the pipe
> into the ground, your first received stations will begin to "grow" in
> strength. This effect will continue for days, growing in increments of
> strength and clarity. Fixed volumes begin to reach levelled states in
> 2 or 3 days, a growth process uncommon with aerial signals. But beyond
> the signal growth of the strong stations, one begins observing the
> gradual increase in station numbers with time. Your initially strong
> stations, those which grew in the course of 3 days, will now become
> interspersed by a great population of faint signals. This "background"
> population will then increase in magnitude and clarity until your
> sweep dial is filled with an immense "crackling". By day 4 or 5 with
> this arrangement, my sweep dial was literally covered with the
> continual "crackle" of new signals.
>=20
> Sweeping the dial will thus continually bring in tiny signal
> "granules" between the stronger signals, those which normally mask
> these almost imperceptible stations. The gradual appearance of new
> stations, and the gradual "arrival" of a great many minor signals,
> begins manifesting with time. The buried pipe becomes a "receptive
> site", into which the upwelling currents actively pour. These effects
> were rediscovered when buried metals began producing their
> characteristic "tone signatures". A singularly fascinating study, we
> found that each buried metal literally became "saturated" with ground
> currents. This saturation process also required a gradual period of
> time (Earth Tones audio tape, BSRF).
>=20
> Because of the slow growth process, where stations grow in both
> strength and number with time, one must eventually secure a larger
> "capacity" receiver. One learns that shortwave radionic applications
> need specific and well designed receivers =97 of the vacuum tube type o=
r
> germanium transistor variety. Many of the newer digital models are
> insufficient. Through a gradual familiarity with numerous models, each
> experimenter will settle upon the use of one or two particular
> favorites. Mr. William Lehr rebuilt a Zenith Trans-Oceanic for me. It
> is a receiver which I cherish, not only because of its wonderful
> "warm" tone and excellent operation with the ground antenna, but
> because he rebuilt it for me personally. The popular set is equipped
> with small screw terminals, one for the normal onboard telescoping
> antenna, and the other for a ground wire. I disengaged the onboard
> telescoping antenna, connecting its internal lead wire instead to the
> ground screw. The ground antenna was then connected to the aerial
> screw.
>=20
> In this reversal, the receiver recognizes the ground antenna as the
> "aerial", while the collapsible onboard antenna is recognized as the
> "ground". This "inversion" of radio inputs more effectively works the
> shortwave capacity in absorbing ground emerging signals, the
> collapsible aerial becoming a miniature "counterpoise" ground. A great
> many separate phenomena are noted with this arrangement, one pioneered
> by Nikola Tesla and (most recently) explored in greatest depth by Mr.
> Eric Dollard. Touching the telescoping "ground" causes the complete
> eradication of signal strengths across the dial, the withdrawal of
> this touch causing the characteristic slow return to original volume.
> One discovers now the necessity of adjusting the telescopic "ground"
> with each tuned station, a means by which increased "room capacity" is
> achieved. The telescopic "ground" facilitates an increased
> connectivity within the volume of space surrounding the receiver.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> OBSERVATION 5
>=20
> With persistent saturation, your ground pipe antenna will continue
> producing a surprising proliferation of signals. In this growing
> manner, signals kept appearing from greater and greater distances.
> Understand that the reception of foreign signals through the ground
> matrix is completely different from that which presupposes the
> downward "skybeaming" of signals. With ground reception there is no
> "skipping". Ground reception is the result of direct contact
> conduction. Signals have to travel from their sources to you...in
> straight lines! You may therefore understand that the most weak and
> distant stations, those innumerable transmitters which lie in the
> "geography between" yourself and certain strong foreign stations, will
> begin to make their appearance. A slow growth period will prove this
> effect to you.
>=20
> But the loss of signal population, when the pipe is retracted for a
> few minutes, cannot be comprehended unless we further examine the
> "signal accretion" phenomenon. The acquisition of new stations into a
> ground antenna occurs throughout the day, regardless of the weather or
> time. The Radionists who studied these phenomena recognized that
> ground emerging signals actively seek out both ground-proximal metals
> as well as those which are actually buried. Ground currents can rise
> to the surface when metal probes are simply aimed toward the ground.
> It has been observed that the mere positioning of a blunt-ended cable
> over ground is sufficient to cause an upward flow of ground currents,
> a reception of signals being obtained (Theroux).
>=20
> The process is one by which ground currents literally "attach"
> themselves to the downward pointing conductor, entwining and fixating
> themselves through time. If this is true for conductors which merely
> point into earth, the same is especially true of metalloforms which
> have been buried. The upwelling emergence of ground currents is the
> result of the pipe itself, a response to a metal body which has been
> buried near the surface. The ground antenna behaves as a very
> definitive metallic "attractor". Driven down into a few feet of earth,
> metal structures literally attract ground currents from their deeply
> consigned pathways upward. The process of attraction and accretion
> requires time. This explains why signal strengths begin to grow when
> buried terminals are first buried, continuing until the pipe and
> receiver have reached their capacity to absorb.
>=20
> The withdrawal of signals, after the pipe has been momentarily
> disturbed, is problematic from every electrical point of view. What
> principle can be cited in explanation of this remarkable signal
> disappearing act? What causes the signals to "shrink away" from the
> ground terminal when its growing potential has been disturbed for a
> few moments of inspection? This "disengagement phenomenon", the
> striking disappearance of signals, compels the recognition of an
> "irritability" factor when dealing with ground currents. Irritability
> is a biological characteristic not present in electrical currents.
> What have these signals to do with biological activities? Wishing to
> address those skeptics who cannot accept this energetic growth
> characteristic in grounded terminals, I pulled up the pipe to better
> inspect its surface. Fully expecting to find the metal "pitted" in
> thousands of tiny corrosion points", the probable points in which the
> innumerable signals appeared, I was not a small bit shocked to find
> the pipe in excellent condition. There was not a bit of visible
> corrosion, certainly no pitting or scarring in the otherwise brilliant
> sheen which it had when I pounded it down into the earth. But the
> mystery did not stop there.
>=20
> I placed the pipe back into a new location, adjacent to its original
> ground chamber. Thus driven down to the exact depth as it had been
> before, I went inside to listen once again. All but the strongest
> signals had disappeared. Obviously, the multiplication of signals is
> not the result of corrosion, not the result of continued ground
> "electrolysis". While "pitting" the pipe exterior with innumerable
> exposures will increase the effective conductive surface of any pipe
> to an amazing degree, such corrosion will play little part in the
> actual increase of signal receptivity. In fact, neither ground
> antennas nor earth batteries corrode; a perplexing fact which we have
> rediscovered long after Nathan Stubblefield made its first mentioned.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> OBSERVATION 6
>=20
> Deep fades are never heard with ground antennas, but one does observe
> sudden "sweeps" which indicate strange and instantaneous ground
> disturbances. These do not disturb station reception, certainly not
> distorting or destabilizing the actual signals being received. Using
> ground antennas, only a very slow wavering is sometimes observed.
> These exceedingly slow waverings occur with no clocklike regularity,
> suggesting that true biological pulsations are being observed. Such
> exhibitions were once referred to me by Dan Winter as the deep earth
> "tides", meaning by this that the biodynamic currents clearly engage
> in native pulsations. Since we have never glimpsed those currents of
> enormous vital potential, those "dragons" which normally reside deep
> in the heart of earth. These currents are definitely modified by
> influences in outer space, rising toward the surface during certain
> seasons, and diving back down to their mysterious haunts once again.
>=20
> During sun-transitional hours, ground received SW signals do not
> appear to be "geodesically" selected. In other words, one does not
> receive a complete "global sweep" of signals, from nation to nation.
> The "sweep" may display continuity across a large region of ground, a
> cluster of neighboring nations being heard in sequence, but each
> region is not received with continuity. One discovers that whole
> regions of the earth suddenly emerge from the SW background and
> literally pred